Wasabi vs. Nattō — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between wasabi and nattō
- Wasabi has more vitamin C, vitamin B6, and fiber, while nattō has more iron, copper, manganese, phosphorus, zinc, magnesium, and calcium.
- Nattō covers your daily need for iron, 95% more than wasabi.
- Wasabi contains 3 times more vitamin C than nattō. While wasabi contains 41.9mg of vitamin C, nattō contains only 13mg.
- Wasabi has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of wasabi is 41, while the glycemic index of nattō is 56.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Wasabi, root, raw and Natto.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +66.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +69.5% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +28.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +735% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +330.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +87% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +117.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -58.8% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +290.8% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +222.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +110.8% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +125% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +22.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +66.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +85.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +25.6% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +304.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1646% |
~equal in
Other
~1.9g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Iron | 1.03mg | 8.6mg | 95% |
| Copper | 0.155mg | 0.667mg | 57% |
| Manganese | 0.391mg | 1.528mg | 49% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 6.21g | 41% | |
| Vitamin C | 41.9mg | 13mg | 32% |
| Protein | 4.8g | 19.4g | 29% |
| Vitamin K | 23.1µg | 19% | |
| Selenium | 8.8µg | 16% | |
| Fats | 0.63g | 11g | 16% |
| Zinc | 1.62mg | 3.03mg | 13% |
| Phosphorus | 80mg | 174mg | 13% |
| Magnesium | 69mg | 115mg | 11% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.274mg | 0.13mg | 11% |
| Choline | 57mg | 10% | |
| Fiber | 7.8g | 5.4g | 10% |
| Calcium | 128mg | 217mg | 9% |
| Saturated fat | 1.591g | 7% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.43g | 6% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.114mg | 0.19mg | 6% |
| Potassium | 568mg | 729mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.743mg | 0mg | 5% |
| Calories | 109kcal | 211kcal | 5% |
| Carbs | 23.54g | 12.68g | 4% |
| Folate | 18µg | 8µg | 3% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.131mg | 0.16mg | 2% |
| Net carbs | 15.74g | 7.28g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.89g | N/A | |
| Sodium | 17mg | 7mg | 0% |
| Vitamin E | 0.01mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin A | 2µg | 0µg | 0% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.203mg | 0.215mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.223mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.813mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.931mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.509mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.145mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.208mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.941mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.018mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.512mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
23%
20%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
116%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Wasabi is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.89g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Wasabi is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.591g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Wasabi is lower in glycemic index (difference - 15)
Which food is cheaper?
Wasabi is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Nattō contains less Sodium (difference - 10mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Nattō is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.