Whelk vs. Lingcod — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between whelk and lingcod?
- The amount of vitamin B12, copper, iron, selenium, manganese, magnesium, zinc, and vitamin B6 in whelk is higher than in lingcod.
- Whelk's daily need coverage for vitamin B12 is 583% more.
- Lingcod contains 59 times less copper than whelk. Whelk contains 2.06mg of copper, while lingcod contains 0.035mg.
- Lingcod has less sodium.
We used Mollusks, whelk, unspecified, cooked, moist heat and Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +421.2% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +527.8% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +23.9% |
| Contains more IronIron | +2353.7% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +5785.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +462.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +3323.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +91.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -81.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +188.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +40% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +54% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +87.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +337.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +16% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +116.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +110.6% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +1150% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +70% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +136.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -75.7% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +698.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +732.6% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 18.14µg | 4.15µg | 583% |
| Copper | 2.06mg | 0.035mg | 225% |
| Iron | 10.06mg | 0.41mg | 121% |
| Selenium | 89.6µg | 46.8µg | 78% |
| Protein | 47.68g | 22.64g | 50% |
| Manganese | 0.89mg | 0.026mg | 38% |
| Magnesium | 172mg | 33mg | 33% |
| Zinc | 3.26mg | 0.58mg | 24% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.65mg | 0.346mg | 23% |
| Cholesterol | 130mg | 67mg | 21% |
| Sodium | 412mg | 76mg | 15% |
| Calcium | 113mg | 18mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.4mg | 0.865mg | 9% |
| Vitamin C | 6.8mg | 0mg | 8% |
| Calories | 275kcal | 109kcal | 8% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.214mg | 0.139mg | 6% |
| Carbs | 15.52g | 0g | 5% |
| Potassium | 694mg | 560mg | 4% |
| Vitamin A | 49µg | 17µg | 4% |
| Phosphorus | 282mg | 258mg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.046g | 0.383g | 2% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.995mg | 2.314mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.049mg | 0.035mg | 1% |
| Saturated fat | 0.062g | 0.255g | 1% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.056g | 0.447g | 1% |
| Fats | 0.8g | 1.36g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 15.52g | 0g | N/A |
| Folate | 11µg | 10µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.618mg | 0.254mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 2.136mg | 0.993mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.655mg | 1.043mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 3.807mg | 1.84mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.93mg | 2.079mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 1.205mg | 0.67mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.648mg | 0.884mg | 0% |
| Valine | 2.075mg | 1.166mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.977mg | 0.667mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.008g | 0.133g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.012g | 0.13g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.018g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
199%
58%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
215%
50%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Whelk is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.193g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Whelk is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Whelk is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Whelk is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Lingcod is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 63mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Lingcod contains less Sodium (difference - 336mg)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)