Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Apple pie vs. Keebler Sugar Cones — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between Apple pie and Keebler Sugar Cones

  • Apple pie has more Monounsaturated Fat, and Polyunsaturated fat, while Keebler Sugar Cones has more Iron, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, and Vitamin B2.
  • Keebler Sugar Cones' daily need coverage for Iron is 25% higher.
  • Keebler Sugar Cones contain 12 times less Phosphorus than Apple pie. Apple pie contains 24mg of Phosphorus, while Keebler Sugar Cones contain 2mg.
  • The amount of Saturated Fat in Keebler Sugar Cones are lower.

The food types used in this comparison are Pie, apple, commercially prepared, unenriched flour and KEEBLER, Sugar Cones.

Infographic

Apple pie vs Keebler Sugar Cones infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 5% 3.3% 5.7% 45% 15% 4.4% 10% 35% 24% 0%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 6.4% 0% 11% 120% 0% 0% 0.86% 43% 0% 0%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +∞%
Contains more CopperCopper +∞%
Contains more ZincZinc +∞%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +1100%
Contains less SodiumSodium -18.4%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +∞%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +28.6%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +83.1%
Contains more IronIron +164.5%
~equal in Selenium ~µg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 11% 7.4% 0% 0% 34% 36% 21% 7.1% 8.8% 1.3% 0% 3% 0%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0% 0% 0% 105% 65% 69% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more FolateFolate +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +213.4%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +77.2%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +229.5%
~equal in Vitamin E ~mg
~equal in Vitamin D ~µg
~equal in Vitamin K ~µg
~equal in Choline ~mg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
2% 11% 34% 52%
Protein: 1.9 g
Fats: 11 g
Carbs: 34 g
Water: 52.2 g
Other: 0.9 g
7% 4% 78% 10%
Protein: 7.3 g
Fats: 3.7 g
Carbs: 78 g
Water: 1 g
Other: 10 g
Contains more FatsFats +197.3%
Contains more WaterWater +5120%
Contains more ProteinProtein +284.2%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +129.4%
Contains more OtherOther +1011.1%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
37% 42% 21%
Saturated Fat: Sat. Fat 3.797 g
Monounsaturated Fat: Mono. Fat 4.388 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 2.198 g
22% 56% 22%
Saturated Fat: Sat. Fat 0.8 g
Monounsaturated Fat: Mono. Fat 2 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.8 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat +119.4%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +174.8%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat -78.9%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Apple pie Keebler Sugar Cones
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Cholesterol Equal
Lower in price Equal
Rich in minerals Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Apple pie Keebler Sugar Cones Opinion
Calories 237kcal 375kcal Keebler Sugar Cones
Protein 1.9g 7.3g Keebler Sugar Cones
Fats 11g 3.7g Apple pie
Vitamin C 3.2mg Apple pie
Net carbs 32.4g 75.9g Keebler Sugar Cones
Carbs 34g 78g Keebler Sugar Cones
Magnesium 7mg 9mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Calcium 11mg Apple pie
Potassium 65mg 119mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Iron 1.21mg 3.2mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Sugar 26.4g Apple pie
Fiber 1.6g 2.1g Keebler Sugar Cones
Copper 0.046mg Apple pie
Zinc 0.16mg Apple pie
Phosphorus 24mg 2mg Apple pie
Sodium 266mg 326mg Apple pie
Vitamin A 124IU Apple pie
Vitamin A 29µg Apple pie
Manganese 0.182mg Apple pie
Vitamin B1 0.134mg 0.42mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Vitamin B2 0.158mg 0.28mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Vitamin B3 1.123mg 3.7mg Keebler Sugar Cones
Vitamin B5 0.119mg Apple pie
Vitamin B6 0.038mg Apple pie
Vitamin B12 0.01µg Apple pie
Folate 4µg 0µg Apple pie
Saturated Fat 3.797g 0.8g Keebler Sugar Cones
Monounsaturated Fat 4.388g 2g Apple pie
Polyunsaturated fat 2.198g 0.8g Apple pie
Tryptophan 0.026mg Apple pie
Threonine 0.054mg Apple pie
Isoleucine 0.073mg Apple pie
Leucine 0.129mg Apple pie
Lysine 0.07mg Apple pie
Methionine 0.032mg Apple pie
Phenylalanine 0.088mg Apple pie
Valine 0.084mg Apple pie
Histidine 0.038mg Apple pie

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Apple pie Keebler Sugar Cones
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
Apple pie
18%
Keebler Sugar Cones
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
15%
Apple pie
18%
Keebler Sugar Cones

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Keebler Sugar Cones
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 2.997g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Keebler Sugar Cones
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in glycemic index (difference - 41)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Apple pie
Apple pie is lower in Sugar (difference - 26.4g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Apple pie
Apple pie contains less Sodium (difference - 60mg)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Apple pie - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/173239/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.