Baby ruth vs. Fortune cookie — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between baby ruth and fortune cookie
- Baby ruth has more copper, magnesium, phosphorus, manganese, and potassium; however, fortune cookie is richer in folate, vitamin B1, and iron.
- Baby ruth's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 57% more.
- Baby ruth contains 7 times more sodium than fortune cookie. Baby ruth contains 230mg of sodium, while fortune cookie contains 31mg.
- Fortune cookie contains less saturated fat.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Candies, NESTLE, BABY RUTH Bar and Cookies, fortune.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +514.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +291.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +507.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +275% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +323.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +168.6% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +84.7% |
| Contains more IronIron | +128.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -86.5% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +16% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +3000% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +12.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +223.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +500% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +109.1% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +481.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +213.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +47.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +450% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
5.4 g
Fats:
21.6 g
Carbs:
64.8 g
Water:
6.99 g
Other:
1.21 g
Protein:
4.2 g
Fats:
2.7 g
Carbs:
84 g
Water:
8 g
Other:
1.1 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +28.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +700% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +29.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +14.4% |
~equal in
Other
~1.1g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
12.1 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
5.557 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.638 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.669 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.345 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.466 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +313.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +466.1% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -94.5% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 12.1g | 0.669g | 52% |
| Fats | 21.6g | 2.7g | 29% |
| Copper | 0.225mg | 0.06mg | 18% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.638g | 0.466g | 14% |
| Folate | 12µg | 66µg | 14% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 5.557g | 1.345g | 11% |
| Iron | 0.63mg | 1.44mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.058mg | 0.182mg | 10% |
| Magnesium | 43mg | 7mg | 9% |
| Sodium | 230mg | 31mg | 9% |
| Phosphorus | 94mg | 35mg | 8% |
| Manganese | 0.351mg | 0.19mg | 7% |
| Vitamin E | 0.93mg | 0.03mg | 6% |
| Potassium | 249mg | 41mg | 6% |
| Carbs | 64.8g | 84g | 6% |
| Zinc | 0.72mg | 0.17mg | 5% |
| Choline | 34.9mg | 6mg | 5% |
| Calories | 459kcal | 378kcal | 4% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.251mg | 1.84mg | 4% |
| Calcium | 47mg | 12mg | 4% |
| Fiber | 2g | 1.6g | 2% |
| Protein | 5.4g | 4.2g | 2% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.042mg | 0.013mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.06µg | 0.01µg | 2% |
| Selenium | 2.5µg | 2.9µg | 1% |
| Caffeine | 4mg | 0mg | 1% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 2mg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 1.1µg | 1% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.121mg | 0.13mg | 1% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.333mg | 0.297mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 62.8g | 82.4g | N/A |
| Sugar | 54g | 45.42g | N/A |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 1µg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 0.05g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.061mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.123mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.165mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.295mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.157mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.076mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.203mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.192mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.088mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.001g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
12%
15%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
31%
15%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Fortune cookie is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.58g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Fortune cookie contains less Sodium (difference - 199mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Fortune cookie is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 11.431g)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Baby ruth is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Baby ruth is lower in glycemic index (difference - 77)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Baby ruth is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.