Bisque vs. Succotash — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between bisque and succotash
- Bisque has less manganese, iron, vitamin B1, copper, fiber, vitamin C, phosphorus, magnesium, and folate than succotash.
- Succotash covers your daily need for manganese, 25% more than bisque.
- Bisque has 106 times more sodium than succotash. While bisque has 424mg of sodium, succotash has only 4mg.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water and Succotash, (corn and limas), raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +1100% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +12.5% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +118.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +454.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +257.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +154.2% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +370.8% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +561.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +20% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +529.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +670.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +182.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +241.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +156% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +261.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +566.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more WaterWater | +19.2% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +446.7% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +104.1% |
~equal in
Fats
~1.02g
~equal in
Other
~1.26g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +41.4% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -13.6% |
~equal in
Polyunsaturated fat
~0.489g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 0.104mg | 0.688mg | 25% |
| Iron | 0.33mg | 1.83mg | 19% |
| Sodium | 424mg | 4mg | 18% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.027mg | 0.208mg | 15% |
| Copper | 0.052mg | 0.186mg | 15% |
| Vitamin C | 2.4mg | 15.1mg | 14% |
| Fiber | 0.2g | 3.8g | 14% |
| Phosphorus | 24mg | 113mg | 13% |
| Magnesium | 4mg | 48mg | 10% |
| Folate | 6µg | 40µg | 9% |
| Protein | 0.92g | 5.03g | 8% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.036mg | 0.13mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.465mg | 1.587mg | 7% |
| Potassium | 169mg | 369mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.029mg | 0.082mg | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.24mg | 0.61mg | 3% |
| Carbs | 9.6g | 19.59g | 3% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.05mg | 0.128mg | 2% |
| Calories | 50kcal | 99kcal | 2% |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 1% | |
| Cholesterol | 2mg | 0mg | 1% |
| Fats | 1.02g | 1.02g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 9.4g | 15.79g | N/A |
| Calcium | 16mg | 18mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 18µg | 15µg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.22g | 0.19g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.28g | 0.198g | 0% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.45g | 0.489g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.009mg | 0.056mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.027mg | 0.209mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.031mg | 0.284mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.051mg | 0.443mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.036mg | 0.295mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.012mg | 0.068mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.031mg | 0.243mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.035mg | 0.306mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.018mg | 0.16mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet | Equal | |
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
17%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
14%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Succotash is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Succotash contains less Sodium (difference - 420mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Succotash is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.03g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 70)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Succotash is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)