Cabbage vs. French toast — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are cabbage and french toast different?
- Cabbage has more vitamin C; however, french toast is richer in selenium, vitamin B2, iron, phosphorus, vitamin B12, and vitamin B1.
- Cabbage covers your daily need for vitamin C, 40% more than french toast.
- Cabbage contains less sodium.
Cabbage, raw and French toast, prepared from recipe, made with low fat (2%) milk types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +26.9% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -96.2% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +41.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +150% |
| Contains more IronIron | +255.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +205.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +272.2% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +350% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +17.5% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +6600% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +12100% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +67.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +2380% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +234.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +702.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +595.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +159% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.28 g
Fats:
0.1 g
Carbs:
5.8 g
Water:
92.18 g
Other:
0.64 g
Protein:
7.7 g
Fats:
10.8 g
Carbs:
25 g
Water:
54.7 g
Other:
1.8 g
| Contains more WaterWater | +68.5% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +501.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +10700% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +331% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +181.3% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.034 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.017 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.017 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.723 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.524 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.594 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.8% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +26511.8% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +15158.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin K | 76µg | 63% | |
| Vitamin C | 36.6mg | 0.3mg | 40% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 116mg | 39% |
| Selenium | 0.3µg | 20.1µg | 36% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.04mg | 0.321mg | 22% |
| Sodium | 18mg | 479mg | 20% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.017g | 2.594g | 17% |
| Fats | 0.1g | 10.8g | 16% |
| Iron | 0.47mg | 1.67mg | 15% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.31µg | 13% |
| Protein | 1.28g | 7.7g | 13% |
| Vitamin A | 5µg | 124µg | 13% |
| Phosphorus | 26mg | 117mg | 13% |
| Saturated fat | 0.034g | 2.723g | 12% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.061mg | 0.204mg | 12% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.017g | 4.524g | 11% |
| Calories | 25kcal | 229kcal | 10% |
| Fiber | 2.5g | 10% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.234mg | 1.628mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.212mg | 0.549mg | 7% |
| Carbs | 5.8g | 25g | 6% |
| Calcium | 40mg | 100mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.124mg | 0.074mg | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.18mg | 0.67mg | 4% |
| Copper | 0.019mg | 0.058mg | 4% |
| Fructose | 1.45g | 2% | |
| Choline | 10.7mg | 2% | |
| Potassium | 170mg | 134mg | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.16mg | 0.188mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 12mg | 17mg | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.15mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 3.3g | 25g | N/A |
| Sugar | 3.2g | N/A | |
| Folate | 43µg | 43µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.011mg | 0.094mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.035mg | 0.305mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.03mg | 0.375mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.041mg | 0.621mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.044mg | 0.413mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.012mg | 0.188mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.032mg | 0.389mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.042mg | 0.419mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.022mg | 0.179mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0g | 0.001g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.01g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
33%
25%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
40%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
French toast is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.2g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
French toast is lower in glycemic index (difference - 67)
Which food is cheaper?
French toast is cheaper (difference - $0.2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
French toast is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cabbage is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 116mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cabbage contains less Sodium (difference - 461mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cabbage is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.689g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.