Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Chuck steak vs. Papadum — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Significant differences between chuck steak and papadum

  • Chuck steak is richer in vitamin B12 and zinc, while papadum is higher in copper, fiber, manganese, iron, magnesium, and folate.
  • Chuck steak covers your daily vitamin B12 needs 126% more than papadum.
  • Chuck steak has 8 times more saturated fat than papadum. Chuck steak has 8.66g of saturated fat, while papadum has 1.084g.
  • Papadum has a higher glycemic index (46) than chuck steak (0).

Specific food types used in this comparison are Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled and Papad.

Infographic

Chuck steak vs Papadum infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 16% 4.8% 29% 92% 26% 237% 83% 9.3% 1.6% 150%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 194% 43% 88% 293% 333% 93% 165% 228% 204% 45%
Contains more ZincZinc +155.3%
Contains less SodiumSodium -95.9%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +231.3%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +1131.8%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +793.8%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +207.7%
Contains more IronIron +218.4%
Contains more CopperCopper +1196.1%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +99.5%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +12916.7%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 2.3% 2% 1.5% 17% 44% 87% 45% 86% 379% 4% 4.5% 43%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 4.3% 1% 0% 69% 60% 28% 55% 66% 0% 1% 164% 0.22%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +100%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +216.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +30.9%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +300%
Contains more CholineCholine +19650%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +85.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +319.7%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +35.1%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +21.9%
Contains more FolateFolate +3550%
~equal in Vitamin C ~0mg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
25% 20% 55%
Protein: 24.98 g
Fats: 19.64 g
Carbs: 0 g
Water: 55.22 g
Other: 0.16 g
26% 3% 60% 3% 8%
Protein: 25.56 g
Fats: 3.25 g
Carbs: 59.87 g
Water: 3.49 g
Other: 7.83 g
Contains more FatsFats +504.3%
Contains more WaterWater +1482.2%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +∞%
Contains more OtherOther +4793.8%
~equal in Protein ~25.56g

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
46% 50% 4%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.81 g
39% 19% 42%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.084 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.532 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 1.148 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +1677.6%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -87.5%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +41.7%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Chuck steak Papadum
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in Sugar Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Chuck steak Papadum DV% diff.
Vitamin B12 3.03µg 0µg 126%
Copper 0.077mg 0.998mg 102%
Fiber 0g 18.6g 74%
Sodium 71mg 1745mg 73%
Manganese 0.012mg 1.562mg 67%
Iron 2.45mg 7.8mg 67%
Magnesium 22mg 271mg 59%
Folate 6µg 219µg 53%
Zinc 8.68mg 3.4mg 48%
Selenium 27.5µg 8.3µg 35%
Saturated fat 8.66g 1.084g 34%
Cholesterol 87mg 4mg 28%
Phosphorus 193mg 385mg 27%
Fats 19.64g 3.25g 25%
Monounsaturated fat 9.457g 0.532g 22%
Vitamin B3 4.663mg 1.472mg 20%
Potassium 325mg 1000mg 20%
Carbs 0g 59.87g 20%
Vitamin B1 0.066mg 0.277mg 18%
Choline 79mg 0.4mg 14%
Calcium 16mg 143mg 13%
Vitamin B6 0.373mg 0.285mg 7%
Vitamin B2 0.191mg 0.258mg 5%
Calories 277kcal 371kcal 5%
Vitamin B5 0.752mg 0.917mg 3%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.81g 1.148g 2%
Protein 24.98g 25.56g 1%
Vitamin D 0.1µg 0µg 1%
Vitamin K 1.6µg 0.4µg 1%
Vitamin A 7µg 13µg 1%
Vitamin D 5IU 0IU 1%
Net carbs 0g 41.27g N/A
Vitamin E 0.1mg 0.05mg 0%
Trans fat 1.287g N/A
Tryptophan 0.281mg 0.266mg 0%
Threonine 1.099mg 0.886mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.062mg 1.303mg 0%
Leucine 2.009mg 2.115mg 0%
Lysine 2.184mg 1.695mg 0%
Methionine 0.709mg 0.372mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.951mg 1.491mg 0%
Valine 1.129mg 1.434mg 0%
Histidine 0.809mg 0.715mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0.001g 0g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.041g N/A
Omega-3 - DPA 0.004g 0g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.006g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 0.619g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Chuck steak Papadum
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
55%
Chuck steak
34%
Papadum
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
65%
Chuck steak
168%
Papadum

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 83mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 7.576g)
Which food is cheaper?
Papadum
Papadum is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1674mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 46)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Chuck steak - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171228/nutrients
  2. Papadum - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/168106/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.