Chuck steak vs Salami - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Chuck steak and Salami different?
- Chuck steak is higher in Vitamin B12, Zinc, and Iron, however Salami is richer in Manganese, Copper, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B5, and Vitamin B3.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Salami is 73% higher.
- Chuck steak contains 3 times more Zinc than Salami. While Chuck steak contains 8.68mg of Zinc, Salami contains only 2.93mg.
- Chuck steak has less Sodium.
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled and Salami, cooked, beef and pork are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Contains
more
Iron
+57.1%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15.8%
Contains
less
Sodium
-95.9%
Contains
more
Zinc
+196.2%
Contains
more
Copper
+363.6%
Equal in Calcium - 15
Equal in Phosphorus - 191
Equal in Potassium - 316
Contains
more
Iron
+57.1%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15.8%
Contains
less
Sodium
-95.9%
Contains
more
Zinc
+196.2%
Contains
more
Copper
+363.6%
Equal in Calcium - 15
Equal in Phosphorus - 191
Equal in Potassium - 316
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Folate
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+99.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+120%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+900%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+456.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+86.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+29.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+59.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+23.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Folate
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+99.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+120%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+900%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+456.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+86.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+29.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+59.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+23.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+100%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 0g | 2.4g |
|
| Protein | 24.98g | 21.85g |
|
| Fats | 19.64g | 25.9g |
|
| Carbs | 0g | 2.4g |
|
| Calories | 277kcal | 336kcal |
|
| Starch | g | g | |
| Fructose | g | 0g |
|
| Sugar | 0g | 0.96g |
|
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | |
| Calcium | 16mg | 15mg |
|
| Iron | 2.45mg | 1.56mg |
|
| Magnesium | 22mg | 19mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 193mg | 191mg |
|
| Potassium | 325mg | 316mg |
|
| Sodium | 71mg | 1740mg |
|
| Zinc | 8.68mg | 2.93mg |
|
| Copper | 0.077mg | 0.357mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 25IU | 0IU |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 0.22mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 41IU |
|
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1µg |
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.066mg | 0.367mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.191mg | 0.357mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 4.663mg | 6.053mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.752mg | 1.201mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.373mg | 0.459mg |
|
| Folate | 6µg | 3µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03µg | 1.52µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 3.2µg |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0.114mg |
|
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0.521mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0.675mg |
|
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0.929mg |
|
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 1.107mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0.301mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0.481mg |
|
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0.668mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0.359mg |
|
| Cholesterol | 87mg | 89mg |
|
| Trans Fat | 1.287g | 0.586g |
|
| Saturated Fat | 8.66g | 9.316g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 9.457g | 11.127g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81g | 2.529g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
The summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfills human daily needs, the more the summary score is.
Vitamin Summary Score
56
58
Mineral Summary Score
62
77
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats, and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of food.
Protein
150%
131%
Carbohydrates
0%
2%
Fats
91%
120%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Salami is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chuck steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.96g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1669mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Chuck steak is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Chuck steak is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.656g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Chuck steak is cheaper (difference - $0.7)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals