Chuck steak vs Salami - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Chuck steak and Salami different?
- Chuck steak is higher in Vitamin B12, Zinc and Iron, however Salami is richer in Manganese, Copper, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B3.
- Daily need coverage for Sodium from Salami is 73% higher.
- Chuck steak contains 3 times more Zinc than Salami. While Chuck steak contains 8.68mg of Zinc, Salami contains only 2.93mg.
- Chuck steak has less Sodium.
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled and Salami, cooked, beef and pork are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Iron
+57.1%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+196.2%
Contains
less
Sodium
-95.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+363.6%
Equal in Calcium - 15
Equal in Potassium - 316
Equal in Phosphorus - 191
Contains
more
Iron
+57.1%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+196.2%
Contains
less
Sodium
-95.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+363.6%
Equal in Calcium - 15
Equal in Potassium - 316
Equal in Phosphorus - 191
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+99.3%
Contains
more
Folate
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+120%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+900%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+456.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+86.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+29.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+59.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+23.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+99.3%
Contains
more
Folate
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+120%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+900%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+456.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+86.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+29.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+59.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+23.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+100%
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
56
58
Mineral Summary Score
62
77
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
150%
131%
Carbohydrates
0%
2%
Fats
91%
120%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Salami is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Chuck steak is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food contains less Sugars?
Chuck steak contains less Sugars (difference - 0.96g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1669mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Chuck steak is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.656g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Chuck steak is cheaper (difference - $0.7)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 277 | 336 |
|
| Protein | 24.98 | 21.85 |
|
| Fats | 19.64 | 25.9 |
|
| Vitamin C | 0 | 0 | |
| Carbs | 0 | 2.4 |
|
| Cholesterol | 87 | 89 |
|
| Vitamin D | 5 | 41 |
|
| Iron | 2.45 | 1.56 |
|
| Calcium | 16 | 15 |
|
| Potassium | 325 | 316 |
|
| Magnesium | 22 | 19 |
|
| Sugars | 0 | 0.96 |
|
| Fiber | 0 | 0 | |
| Copper | 0.077 | 0.357 |
|
| Zinc | 8.68 | 2.93 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 193 | 191 |
|
| Sodium | 71 | 1740 |
|
| Vitamin A | 25 | 0 |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.1 | 0.22 |
|
| Vitamin D | 0.1 | 1 |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.066 | 0.367 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.191 | 0.357 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 4.663 | 6.053 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.752 | 1.201 |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.373 | 0.459 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03 | 1.52 |
|
| Vitamin K | 1.6 | 3.2 |
|
| Folate | 6 | 3 |
|
| Trans Fat | 1.287 | 0.586 |
|
| Saturated Fat | 8.66 | 9.316 |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 9.457 | 11.127 |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81 | 2.529 |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.281 | 0.114 |
|
| Threonine | 1.099 | 0.521 |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.062 | 0.675 |
|
| Leucine | 2.009 | 0.929 |
|
| Lysine | 2.184 | 1.107 |
|
| Methionine | 0.709 | 0.301 |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.951 | 0.481 |
|
| Valine | 1.129 | 0.668 |
|
| Histidine | 0.809 | 0.359 |
|
| Fructose | 0 |
|