Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Condensed milk vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

How are condensed milk and Limburger different?

  • Condensed milk is higher in choline; however, Limburger is richer in vitamin B12, calcium, phosphorus, vitamin A, folate, and zinc.
  • Daily need coverage for saturated fat for Limburger is 56% higher.
  • Condensed milk contains 6 times more choline than Limburger. While condensed milk contains 89.1mg of choline, Limburger contains only 15.4mg.
  • Condensed milk has less cholesterol.
  • Limburger has a lower glycemic index (27) than condensed milk (61).

Milk, canned, condensed, sweetened and Cheese, limburger are the varieties used in this article.

Infographic

Condensed milk vs Limburger infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 19% 85% 33% 7.1% 5% 26% 108% 17% 0.78% 81%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +23.8%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +189.8%
Contains more IronIron +46.2%
Contains less SodiumSodium -84.1%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +75%
Contains more CopperCopper +40%
Contains more ZincZinc +123.4%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +55.3%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +533.3%
~equal in Selenium ~14.5µg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 8.7% 25% 3.2% 3% 23% 96% 3.9% 45% 12% 55% 1.5% 8.3% 49%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +12.5%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +32.9%
Contains more CholineCholine +478.6%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +359.5%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +43.8%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +150%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +20.9%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +56.9%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +68.6%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +136.4%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +283.3%
Contains more FolateFolate +427.3%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
8% 9% 54% 27% 2%
Protein: 7.91 g
Fats: 8.7 g
Carbs: 54.4 g
Water: 27.16 g
Other: 1.83 g
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +11002%
Contains more ProteinProtein +153.5%
Contains more FatsFats +213.2%
Contains more WaterWater +78.3%
Contains more OtherOther +107.1%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
66% 29% 4%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 5.486 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 2.427 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.337 g
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -67.2%
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +254.6%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +46.9%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Condensed milk Limburger
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Condensed milk Limburger DV% diff.
Saturated fat 5.486g 16.746g 51%
Vitamin A 74µg 340µg 30%
Fats 8.7g 27.25g 29%
Sodium 127mg 800mg 29%
Vitamin B12 0.44µg 1.04µg 25%
Protein 7.91g 20.05g 24%
Calcium 284mg 497mg 21%
Phosphorus 253mg 393mg 20%
Cholesterol 34mg 90mg 19%
Carbs 54.4g 0.49g 18%
Monounsaturated fat 2.427g 8.606g 15%
Choline 89.1mg 15.4mg 13%
Folate 11µg 58µg 12%
Zinc 0.94mg 2.1mg 11%
Vitamin B5 0.75mg 1.177mg 9%
Potassium 371mg 128mg 7%
Vitamin B2 0.416mg 0.503mg 7%
Vitamin B6 0.051mg 0.086mg 3%
Vitamin C 2.6mg 0mg 3%
Vitamin D 6IU 20IU 2%
Vitamin D 0.2µg 0.5µg 2%
Selenium 14.8µg 14.5µg 1%
Vitamin B1 0.09mg 0.08mg 1%
Manganese 0.006mg 0.038mg 1%
Copper 0.015mg 0.021mg 1%
Iron 0.19mg 0.13mg 1%
Magnesium 26mg 21mg 1%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.337g 0.495g 1%
Vitamin K 0.6µg 2.3µg 1%
Calories 321kcal 327kcal 0%
Net carbs 54.4g 0.49g N/A
Sugar 54.4g 0.49g N/A
Vitamin E 0.16mg 0.23mg 0%
Vitamin B3 0.21mg 0.158mg 0%
Tryptophan 0.112mg 0.289mg 0%
Threonine 0.357mg 0.739mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.479mg 1.219mg 0%
Leucine 0.775mg 2.093mg 0%
Lysine 0.627mg 1.675mg 0%
Methionine 0.198mg 0.619mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.382mg 1.116mg 0%
Valine 0.529mg 1.439mg 0%
Histidine 0.214mg 0.578mg 0%

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Condensed milk Limburger
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
26%
Condensed milk
42%
Limburger
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
38%
Condensed milk
60%
Limburger

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 53.91g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 34)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Condensed milk
Condensed milk is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 56mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Condensed milk
Condensed milk contains less Sodium (difference - 673mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Condensed milk
Condensed milk is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 11.26g)
Which food is cheaper?
Condensed milk
Condensed milk is cheaper (difference - $1.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Condensed milk - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171275/nutrients
  2. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.