Cutlet vs. Mayonnaise — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between cutlet and mayonnaise
- Mayonnaise contains less vitamin B3, vitamin B2, vitamin E, vitamin B6, iron, fiber, and zinc than cutlet.
- Cutlet's daily need coverage for vitamin B3 is 164% higher.
- The amount of sodium in cutlet is lower.
The food types used in this comparison are WORTHINGTON Multigrain Cutlets, canned, unprepared and Salad dressing, mayonnaise, regular.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +200% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +175% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +425% |
| Contains more IronIron | +709.5% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +566.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +166.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -41.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +451.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +400% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +6900% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +6150% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +150% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
23.29 g
Fats:
1.5 g
Carbs:
7.3 g
Water:
66.69 g
Other:
1.22 g
Protein:
0.96 g
Fats:
74.85 g
Carbs:
0.57 g
Water:
21.65 g
Other:
1.97 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +2326% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1180.7% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +208% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +4890% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +61.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.3 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.2 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.8 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
11.703 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
16.843 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
44.69 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -97.4% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +8321.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +5486.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.8g | 44.69g | 293% |
| Vitamin B3 | 26.29mg | 0mg | 164% |
| Vitamin K | 163µg | 136% | |
| Fats | 1.5g | 74.85g | 113% |
| Vitamin B2 | 1.33mg | 0.019mg | 101% |
| Vitamin E | 18.09mg | 3.28mg | 99% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3g | 11.703g | 52% |
| Protein | 23.29g | 0.96g | 45% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.2g | 16.843g | 42% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.5mg | 0.008mg | 38% |
| Calories | 117kcal | 680kcal | 28% |
| Iron | 1.7mg | 0.21mg | 19% |
| Fiber | 4.5g | 0g | 18% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 42mg | 14% |
| Sodium | 371mg | 635mg | 11% |
| Zinc | 1mg | 0.15mg | 8% |
| Choline | 34.2mg | 6% | |
| Phosphorus | 56mg | 21mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.12µg | 5% |
| Selenium | 2.3µg | 4% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05mg | 0.01mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.172mg | 3% | |
| Potassium | 105mg | 20mg | 3% |
| Vitamin A | 16µg | 2% | |
| Copper | 0.019mg | 2% | |
| Carbs | 7.3g | 0.57g | 2% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.2µg | 1% |
| Calcium | 22mg | 8mg | 1% |
| Folate | 2µg | 5µg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 7IU | 1% |
| Net carbs | 2.8g | 0.57g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 3mg | 1mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.2g | 0.57g | N/A |
| Manganese | 0.007mg | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0g | 0.187g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.017mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.055mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.065mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.095mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.072mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.035mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.057mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.074mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.026mg | 0% | |
| Fructose | 0.05g | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.005g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 5.331g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - Eicosatrienoic acid | 0.002g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.125g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.03g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 38.942g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
99%
41%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
13%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cutlet is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 42mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Cutlet is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.37g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cutlet contains less Sodium (difference - 264mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cutlet is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 11.403g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Cutlet is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is cheaper?
Cutlet is cheaper (difference - $0.6)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.