French rolls vs. Keebler Sugar Cones — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between french rolls and keebler Sugar Cones?
- French rolls are higher in folate, phosphorus, and vitamin B1; however, keebler Sugar Cones are richer in iron.
- French rolls' daily need coverage for folate is 28% more.
- Keebler Sugar Cones contain 42 times less phosphorus than french rolls. French rolls contain 84mg of phosphorus, while keebler Sugar Cones contain 2mg.
- Keebler Sugar Cones have less sodium.
We used Rolls, french and KEEBLER, Sugar Cones types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +122.2% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +4100% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +18.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -43.2% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +24.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +17.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
8.6 g
Fats:
4.3 g
Carbs:
50.2 g
Water:
34.8 g
Other:
2.1 g
Protein:
7.3 g
Fats:
3.7 g
Carbs:
78 g
Water:
1 g
Other:
10 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +17.8% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +16.2% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +3380% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +55.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +376.2% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.962 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.961 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.834 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.8 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.8 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -16.8% |
~equal in
Monounsaturated fat
~2g
~equal in
Polyunsaturated fat
~0.8g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Selenium | 27.9µg | 51% | |
| Folate | 113µg | 0µg | 28% |
| Manganese | 0.559mg | 24% | |
| Methionine | 153mg | 15% | |
| Copper | 0.135mg | 15% | |
| Phosphorus | 84mg | 2mg | 12% |
| Sodium | 574mg | 326mg | 11% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.523mg | 0.42mg | 9% |
| Carbs | 50.2g | 78g | 9% |
| Calcium | 91mg | 9% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.452mg | 9% | |
| Zinc | 0.9mg | 8% | |
| Iron | 2.71mg | 3.2mg | 6% |
| Calories | 277kcal | 375kcal | 5% |
| Fiber | 3.2g | 2.1g | 4% |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.352mg | 3.7mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.039mg | 3% | |
| Magnesium | 20mg | 9mg | 3% |
| Choline | 14.8mg | 3% | |
| Protein | 8.6g | 7.3g | 3% |
| Vitamin K | 1.8µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.3mg | 0.28mg | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.3mg | 2% | |
| Saturated fat | 0.962g | 0.8g | 1% |
| Fats | 4.3g | 3.7g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 47g | 75.9g | N/A |
| Potassium | 114mg | 119mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.31g | 26.4g | N/A |
| Monounsaturated fat | 1.961g | 2g | 0% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.834g | 0.8g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.099mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.255mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.336mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.608mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.231mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.422mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.38mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.188mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
32%
18%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
56%
18%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Keebler Sugar Cones contains less Sodium (difference - 248mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.162g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in glycemic index (difference - 63)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
French rolls is lower in Sugar (difference - 26.09g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
French rolls is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
French rolls is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)