Keebler Sugar Cones vs. Sweet roll — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between keebler Sugar Cones and sweet roll
- Keebler Sugar Cones are richer in iron, vitamin B3, and vitamin B1, yet sweet roll is richer in folate, phosphorus, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat.
- Daily need coverage for cholesterol for sweet roll is 22% higher.
- Keebler Sugar Cones contain 2 times more iron than sweet roll. Keebler Sugar Cones contain 3.2mg of iron, while sweet roll contains 1.6mg.
- Keebler Sugar Cones contain less saturated fat.
Food types used in this article are KEEBLER, Sugar Cones and Sweet rolls, cinnamon, commercially prepared with raisins.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +100% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +88.9% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +3700% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +29.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +55.2% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
7.3 g
Fats:
3.7 g
Carbs:
78 g
Water:
1 g
Other:
10 g
Protein:
6.2 g
Fats:
16.4 g
Carbs:
50.9 g
Water:
24.8 g
Other:
1.7 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +17.7% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +53.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +488.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +343.2% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +2380% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.8 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.8 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
3.079 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.797 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
7.473 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -74% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +139.9% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +834.1% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.8g | 7.473g | 44% |
| Selenium | 17µg | 31% | |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 66mg | 22% |
| Fats | 3.7g | 16.4g | 20% |
| Iron | 3.2mg | 1.6mg | 20% |
| Folate | 0µg | 72µg | 18% |
| Manganese | 0.3mg | 13% | |
| Vitamin E | 1.99mg | 13% | |
| Phosphorus | 2mg | 76mg | 11% |
| Saturated fat | 0.8g | 3.079g | 10% |
| Copper | 0.088mg | 10% | |
| Carbs | 78g | 50.9g | 9% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.107mg | 8% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.406mg | 8% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 3.7mg | 2.384mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.42mg | 0.324mg | 8% |
| Choline | 41.3mg | 8% | |
| Vitamin A | 62µg | 7% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2g | 4.797g | 7% |
| Calcium | 72mg | 7% | |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.14µg | 6% | |
| Zinc | 0.59mg | 5% | |
| Vitamin K | 4.4µg | 4% | |
| Protein | 7.3g | 6.2g | 2% |
| Magnesium | 9mg | 17mg | 2% |
| Vitamin C | 2mg | 2% | |
| Sodium | 326mg | 304mg | 1% |
| Fiber | 2.1g | 2.4g | 1% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.28mg | 0.265mg | 1% |
| Calories | 375kcal | 372kcal | 0% |
| Net carbs | 75.9g | 48.5g | N/A |
| Potassium | 119mg | 111mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 26.4g | 31.73g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.074mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.211mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.259mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.458mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.243mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.117mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.3mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.291mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.145mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.004g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
31%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
35%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Sweet roll is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Sweet roll contains less Sodium (difference - 22mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Sweet roll is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 66mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Sugar (difference - 5.33g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.279g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in glycemic index (difference - 40)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)