Kielbasa vs. Fortune cookie — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between kielbasa and fortune cookie
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat; however, fortune cookie is higher in fiber.
- Kielbasa covers your daily sodium needs 51% more than fortune cookie.
- Fortune cookie has less sodium.
- The glycemic index of fortune cookie is higher.
Food varieties used in this article are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Cookies, fortune.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +16.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -97.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
4.2 g
Fats:
2.7 g
Carbs:
84 g
Water:
8 g
Other:
1.1 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +211.9% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +551.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +675% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +209.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +2053.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.669 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.345 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.466 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +514.9% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +400% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -89.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 31mg | 51% |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 84g | 27% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0.669g | 25% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 2.7g | 23% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 2mg | 23% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 4.2g | 18% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 1.345g | 17% |
| Folate | 66µg | 17% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.182mg | 15% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.466g | 12% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.84mg | 12% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.13mg | 10% | |
| Manganese | 0.19mg | 8% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 378kcal | 8% |
| Copper | 0.06mg | 7% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 1.6g | 6% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.297mg | 6% | |
| Phosphorus | 35mg | 5% | |
| Selenium | 2.9µg | 5% | |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 1.44mg | 3% |
| Magnesium | 7mg | 2% | |
| Zinc | 0.17mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin K | 1.1µg | 1% | |
| Calcium | 12mg | 1% | |
| Potassium | 41mg | 1% | |
| Choline | 6mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.013mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 82.4g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 45.42g | N/A |
| Vitamin E | 0.03mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 1µg | 0% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.01µg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.061mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.123mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.165mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.295mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.157mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.076mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.203mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.192mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.088mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.001g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
15%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
15%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 45.42g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 49)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Fortune cookie is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 68mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Fortune cookie contains less Sodium (difference - 1169mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Fortune cookie is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 5.561g)
Which food is cheaper?
Fortune cookie is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Fortune cookie is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Fortune cookie is relatively richer in vitamins