Lamb ribs vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between lamb ribs and chuck steak
- Lamb ribs is higher in vitamin B3 and monounsaturated fat; however, chuck steak is richer in zinc, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, iron, and selenium.
- Chuck steak's daily need coverage for zinc is 47% higher.
The food types used in this comparison are Lamb, domestic, rib, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +37.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +49.4% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +58.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +19.9% |
| Contains more IronIron | +53.1% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +148.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +16.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +26.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +36.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +44.8% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +150% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +19.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +239.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +35.9% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
21.12 g
Fats:
29.82 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
47.89 g
Other:
1.17 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +51.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +631.3% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +18.3% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +15.3% |
~equal in
Carbs
~0g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
12.77 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
12.52 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.17 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.81 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +32.4% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +167.9% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -32.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Zinc | 3.49mg | 8.68mg | 47% |
| Vitamin B12 | 2.23µg | 3.03µg | 33% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.11mg | 0.373mg | 20% |
| Saturated fat | 12.77g | 8.66g | 19% |
| Fats | 29.82g | 19.64g | 16% |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 6.75mg | 4.663mg | 13% |
| Iron | 1.6mg | 2.45mg | 11% |
| Selenium | 21.8µg | 27.5µg | 10% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.17g | 0.81g | 9% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 12.52g | 9.457g | 8% |
| Protein | 21.12g | 24.98g | 8% |
| Calories | 359kcal | 277kcal | 4% |
| Phosphorus | 166mg | 193mg | 4% |
| Copper | 0.115mg | 0.077mg | 4% |
| Cholesterol | 97mg | 87mg | 3% |
| Potassium | 271mg | 325mg | 2% |
| Folate | 15µg | 6µg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.09mg | 0.066mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.63mg | 0.752mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 7µg | 1% |
| Calcium | 22mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 1.6µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.21mg | 0.191mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 20mg | 22mg | 0% |
| Sodium | 73mg | 71mg | 0% |
| Vitamin E | 0.1mg | 0.1mg | 0% |
| Manganese | 0.019mg | 0.012mg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 1.287g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.247mg | 0.281mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.904mg | 1.099mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.019mg | 1.062mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.642mg | 2.009mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.865mg | 2.184mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.542mg | 0.709mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.86mg | 0.951mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.139mg | 1.129mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.669mg | 0.809mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
43%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
44%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Lamb ribs is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food is cheaper?
Lamb ribs is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Chuck steak is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 10mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 2mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chuck steak is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 4.11g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.