Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Fortune cookie — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

A recap on differences between Limburger and fortune cookie

  • Fortune cookie has less phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, vitamin A, selenium, and vitamin B5.
  • Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 80% more than fortune cookie.
  • Fortune cookie contains 385 times less vitamin A than Limburger. Limburger contains 1155IU of vitamin A, while fortune cookie contains 3IU.
  • Fortune cookie has less cholesterol.
  • The glycemic index of fortune cookie is higher.

Food varieties used in this article are Cheese, limburger and Cookies, fortune.

Infographic

Limburger vs Fortune cookie infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 5% 3.6% 3.6% 54% 20% 4.6% 15% 4% 25% 16%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +200%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +4041.7%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +212.2%
Contains more ZincZinc +1135.3%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +1022.9%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +400%
Contains more IronIron +1007.7%
Contains more CopperCopper +185.7%
Contains less SodiumSodium -96.1%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +400%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0.33% 0.6% 0% 46% 30% 35% 18% 3% 1.3% 2.8% 50% 3.3%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +33900%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +666.7%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +286.9%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +296.3%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +561.5%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +10300%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +109.1%
Contains more CholineCholine +156.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +127.5%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +1064.6%
Contains more FolateFolate +13.8%
~equal in Vitamin C ~0mg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
4% 3% 84% 8%
Protein: 4.2 g
Fats: 2.7 g
Carbs: 84 g
Water: 8 g
Other: 1.1 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +377.4%
Contains more FatsFats +909.3%
Contains more WaterWater +505.3%
Contains more OtherOther +244.5%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +17042.9%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
27% 54% 19%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.669 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 1.345 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.466 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +539.9%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -96%
~equal in Polyunsaturated fat ~0.466g

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Fortune cookie
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Fortune cookie DV% diff.
Saturated fat 16.746g 0.669g 73%
Phosphorus 393mg 35mg 51%
Calcium 497mg 12mg 49%
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0.01µg 43%
Fats 27.25g 2.7g 38%
Vitamin A 340µg 1µg 38%
Sodium 800mg 31mg 33%
Protein 20.05g 4.2g 32%
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.13mg 29%
Cholesterol 90mg 2mg 29%
Carbs 0.49g 84g 28%
Selenium 14.5µg 2.9µg 21%
Zinc 2.1mg 0.17mg 18%
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.297mg 18%
Monounsaturated fat 8.606g 1.345g 18%
Iron 0.13mg 1.44mg 16%
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 1.84mg 11%
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.182mg 9%
Manganese 0.038mg 0.19mg 7%
Fiber 0g 1.6g 6%
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.013mg 6%
Copper 0.021mg 0.06mg 4%
Calories 327kcal 378kcal 3%
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg 3%
Potassium 128mg 41mg 3%
Magnesium 21mg 7mg 3%
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU 3%
Folate 58µg 66µg 2%
Choline 15.4mg 6mg 2%
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.03mg 1%
Vitamin K 2.3µg 1.1µg 1%
Net carbs 0.49g 82.4g N/A
Sugar 0.49g 45.42g N/A
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 0.466g 0%
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.061mg 0%
Threonine 0.739mg 0.123mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.165mg 0%
Leucine 2.093mg 0.295mg 0%
Lysine 1.675mg 0.157mg 0%
Methionine 0.619mg 0.076mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.203mg 0%
Valine 1.439mg 0.192mg 0%
Histidine 0.578mg 0.088mg 0%
Omega-3 - DHA 0g 0.001g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Fortune cookie
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
Limburger
15%
Fortune cookie
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
15%
Fortune cookie

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 44.93g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 50)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Fortune cookie
Fortune cookie is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 88mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Fortune cookie
Fortune cookie contains less Sodium (difference - 769mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Fortune cookie
Fortune cookie is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.077g)
Which food is cheaper?
Fortune cookie
Fortune cookie is cheaper (difference - $3)

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Fortune cookie - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/172722/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.