Naranjilla vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between naranjilla and chuck steak
- Naranjilla is richer in vitamin A and vitamin K, while chuck steak is higher in zinc, selenium, iron, phosphorus, vitamin B6, vitamin B3, vitamin B2, and vitamin B5.
- Chuck steak covers your daily zinc needs 78% more than naranjilla.
- Naranjilla has 23 times more vitamin A than chuck steak. Naranjilla has 568IU of vitamin A, while chuck steak has 25IU.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Naranjilla (lulo) pulp, frozen, unsweetened and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -94.4% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +458.3% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +100% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +100% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +62.5% |
| Contains more IronIron | +600% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +175% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +8580% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1508.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +6775% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +300% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +650% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +812.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +46.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +221.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +241.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +248.6% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +100% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0.44 g
Fats:
0.22 g
Carbs:
5.9 g
Water:
93.05 g
Other:
0.39 g
Protein:
24.98 g
Fats:
19.64 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
55.22 g
Other:
0.16 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +68.5% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +143.8% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +5577.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +8827.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.03µg | 126% | |
| Zinc | 0.1mg | 8.68mg | 78% |
| Protein | 0.44g | 24.98g | 49% |
| Selenium | 0.4µg | 27.5µg | 49% |
| Saturated fat | 8.66g | 39% | |
| Fats | 0.22g | 19.64g | 30% |
| Cholesterol | 87mg | 29% | |
| Iron | 0.35mg | 2.45mg | 26% |
| Phosphorus | 12mg | 193mg | 26% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 9.457g | 24% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.45mg | 4.663mg | 20% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.107mg | 0.373mg | 20% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0mg | 0.191mg | 15% |
| Choline | 79mg | 14% | |
| Calories | 25kcal | 277kcal | 13% |
| Vitamin K | 14.6µg | 1.6µg | 11% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.22mg | 0.752mg | 11% |
| Copper | 0.028mg | 0.077mg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.81g | 5% | |
| Vitamin C | 3.2mg | 0mg | 4% |
| Potassium | 200mg | 325mg | 4% |
| Fiber | 1.1g | 0g | 4% |
| Vitamin E | 0.75mg | 0.1mg | 4% |
| Magnesium | 11mg | 22mg | 3% |
| Sodium | 4mg | 71mg | 3% |
| Manganese | 0.067mg | 0.012mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.045mg | 0.066mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 28µg | 7µg | 2% |
| Carbs | 5.9g | 0g | 2% |
| Fructose | 1.04g | 1% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg | 1% | |
| Calcium | 8mg | 16mg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 5IU | 1% | |
| Folate | 3µg | 6µg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 4.8g | 0g | N/A |
| Sugar | 3.74g | 0g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0g | 1.287g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.281mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.062mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.009mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.184mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.709mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.951mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.129mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.809mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.001g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.041g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.004g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.006g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.619g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
12%
55%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
7%
65%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Naranjilla is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 87mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Naranjilla contains less Sodium (difference - 67mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Naranjilla is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 8.66g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Naranjilla is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is cheaper?
Naranjilla is cheaper (difference - $1.2)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chuck steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.74g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins