Nattō vs. Tarragon — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between nattō and tarragon
- Nattō contains less iron, manganese, vitamin B6, calcium, vitamin B2, potassium, folate, vitamin B3, magnesium, and vitamin C than tarragon.
- Daily need coverage for iron for tarragon is 296% higher.
- Nattō has a higher glycemic index than tarragon.
Food types used in this article are Natto and Spices, tarragon, dried.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -88.7% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +100% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +201.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +424.9% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +314.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +275.6% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +28.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +79.9% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +421.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +284.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +56.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +604.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1753.8% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +3325% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more FatsFats | +51.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +610.9% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +17.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +296.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +533.2% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -15.4% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +412.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +67.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Iron | 8.6mg | 32.3mg | 296% |
| Manganese | 1.528mg | 7.967mg | 280% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg | 2.41mg | 175% |
| Calcium | 217mg | 1139mg | 92% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.19mg | 1.339mg | 88% |
| Potassium | 729mg | 3020mg | 67% |
| Folate | 8µg | 274µg | 67% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 8.95mg | 56% |
| Magnesium | 115mg | 347mg | 55% |
| Vitamin C | 13mg | 50mg | 41% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 210µg | 23% |
| Phosphorus | 174mg | 313mg | 20% |
| Vitamin K | 23.1µg | 19% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 6.21g | 3.698g | 17% |
| Carbs | 12.68g | 50.22g | 13% |
| Choline | 57mg | 10% | |
| Selenium | 8.8µg | 4.4µg | 8% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.16mg | 0.251mg | 8% |
| Zinc | 3.03mg | 3.9mg | 8% |
| Fiber | 5.4g | 7.4g | 8% |
| Protein | 19.4g | 22.77g | 7% |
| Fats | 11g | 7.24g | 6% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.43g | 0.474g | 5% |
| Calories | 211kcal | 295kcal | 4% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.215mg | 4% | |
| Sodium | 7mg | 62mg | 2% |
| Copper | 0.667mg | 0.677mg | 1% |
| Saturated fat | 1.591g | 1.881g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 7.28g | 42.82g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.89g | N/A | |
| Vitamin E | 0.01mg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.223mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.813mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.931mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.509mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.145mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.208mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.941mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.018mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.512mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
118%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
116%
360%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tarragon is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.89g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tarragon is lower in glycemic index (difference - 56)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tarragon is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Nattō contains less Sodium (difference - 55mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Nattō is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.29g)
Which food is cheaper?
Nattō is cheaper (difference - $3.9)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.