Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Foods
  3. Grains
  4. Papadum
  5. Compare
  6. Papadum vs. Chicken sandwich

Papadum vs. Chicken sandwich — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Important differences between papadum and chicken sandwich

  • Papadum has more copper, iron, fiber, magnesium, manganese, folate, phosphorus, and zinc; however, chicken sandwich is richer in vitamin B3.
  • Papadum's daily need coverage for copper is 103% more.
  • Papadum contains 13 times more fiber than chicken sandwich. Papadum contains 18.6g of fiber, while chicken sandwich contains 1.4g.
  • Chicken sandwich contains less sodium.
  • Chicken sandwich has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of chicken sandwich is 74, while the glycemic index of papadum is 46.

The food varieties used in the comparison are Papad and Fast foods, chicken fillet sandwich, plain with pickles.

Infographic

Papadum vs Chicken sandwich infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 194% 43% 88% 293% 333% 93% 165% 228% 204% 45%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 17% 17% 22% 66% 22% 17% 79% 98% 29% 109%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +1029.2%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +146.6%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +308.2%
Contains more IronIron +340.7%
Contains more CopperCopper +1389.6%
Contains more ZincZinc +457.4%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +108.1%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +613.2%
Contains less SodiumSodium -56.8%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +139.8%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 4.3% 1% 0% 69% 60% 28% 55% 66% 0% 1% 164% 0.22%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 2.7% 1% 48% 1.5% 58% 69% 145% 72% 88% 16% 21% 35% 19%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +333.3%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +20.4%
Contains more FolateFolate +366%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +4720%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +16.3%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +424.5%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +30.9%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +34.4%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +2025%
Contains more CholineCholine +8725%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
26% 3% 60% 3% 8%
Protein: 25.56 g
Fats: 3.25 g
Carbs: 59.87 g
Water: 3.49 g
Other: 7.83 g
16% 11% 21% 49% 3%
Protein: 16.28 g
Fats: 11.19 g
Carbs: 20.89 g
Water: 48.94 g
Other: 2.7 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +57%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +186.6%
Contains more OtherOther +190%
Contains more FatsFats +244.3%
Contains more WaterWater +1302.3%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
39% 19% 42%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.084 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.532 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 1.148 g
22% 46% 32%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 2.123 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 4.481 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 3.177 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -48.9%
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +742.3%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +176.7%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Papadum Chicken sandwich
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Lower in price Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Papadum Chicken sandwich DV% diff.
Copper 0.998mg 0.067mg 103%
Iron 7.8mg 1.77mg 75%
Fiber 18.6g 1.4g 69%
Magnesium 271mg 24mg 59%
Manganese 1.562mg 0.219mg 58%
Folate 219µg 47µg 43%
Sodium 1745mg 753mg 43%
Vitamin B3 1.472mg 7.72mg 39%
Phosphorus 385mg 185mg 29%
Zinc 3.4mg 0.61mg 25%
Potassium 1000mg 245mg 22%
Selenium 8.3µg 19.9µg 21%
Protein 25.56g 16.28g 19%
Vitamin E 0.05mg 2.41mg 16%
Polyunsaturated fat 1.148g 3.177g 14%
Carbs 59.87g 20.89g 13%
Fats 3.25g 11.19g 12%
Cholesterol 4mg 35mg 10%
Monounsaturated fat 0.532g 4.481g 10%
Calcium 143mg 58mg 9%
Vitamin B6 0.285mg 0.383mg 8%
Starch 16.5g 7%
Vitamin K 0.4µg 8.5µg 7%
Choline 0.4mg 35.3mg 6%
Calories 371kcal 250kcal 6%
Vitamin B5 0.917mg 1.2mg 6%
Saturated fat 1.084g 2.123g 5%
Vitamin B12 0µg 0.13µg 5%
Vitamin B1 0.277mg 0.23mg 4%
Vitamin B2 0.258mg 0.3mg 3%
Fructose 0.97g 1%
Vitamin D 0µg 0.1µg 1%
Vitamin A 13µg 3µg 1%
Vitamin D 0IU 5IU 1%
Vitamin C 0mg 0.8mg 1%
Net carbs 41.27g 19.49g N/A
Sugar 0g 3.64g N/A
Trans fat 0.03g N/A
Tryptophan 0.266mg 0%
Threonine 0.886mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.303mg 0%
Leucine 2.115mg 0%
Lysine 1.695mg 0%
Methionine 0.372mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.491mg 0%
Valine 1.434mg 0%
Histidine 0.715mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - DHA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.197g N/A
Omega-3 - DPA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid 0.009g N/A
Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid 0.008g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.006g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 2.884g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Papadum Chicken sandwich
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Papadum
Papadum vs Macaroon
Macaroon
Papadum
Papadum vs Cocktail sauce
Cocktail sauce
Papadum
Papadum vs Patty
Patty
Chicken sandwich
Chicken sandwich vs Fish sandwich
Fish sandwich
Chicken sandwich
Chicken sandwich vs Fast food
Fast food
Chicken sandwich
Chicken sandwich vs Hamburger
Hamburger

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
34%
Papadum
44%
Chicken sandwich
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
168%
Papadum
48%
Chicken sandwich

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 31mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.64g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.039g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chicken sandwich
Chicken sandwich contains less Sodium (difference - 992mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chicken sandwich
Chicken sandwich is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Papadum - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/168106/nutrients
  2. Chicken sandwich - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170295/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.