Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Foods
  3. Grains
  4. Papadum
  5. Compare
  6. Papadum vs. Chuck steak

Papadum vs. Chuck steak — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Significant differences between papadum and chuck steak

  • Papadum is richer in copper, fiber, manganese, iron, magnesium, and folate, while chuck steak is higher in vitamin B12 and zinc.
  • Chuck steak covers your daily vitamin B12 needs 126% more than papadum.
  • Chuck steak is lower in sodium.
  • Papadum has a higher glycemic index (46) than chuck steak (0).

Specific food types used in this comparison are Papad and Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled.

Infographic

Papadum vs Chuck steak infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 194% 43% 88% 293% 333% 93% 165% 228% 204% 45%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 16% 4.8% 29% 92% 26% 237% 83% 9.3% 1.6% 150%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +1131.8%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +793.8%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +207.7%
Contains more IronIron +218.4%
Contains more CopperCopper +1196.1%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +99.5%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +12916.7%
Contains more ZincZinc +155.3%
Contains less SodiumSodium -95.9%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +231.3%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 4.3% 1% 0% 69% 60% 28% 55% 66% 0% 1% 164% 0.22%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 2.3% 2% 1.5% 17% 44% 87% 45% 86% 379% 4% 4.5% 43%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +85.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +319.7%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +35.1%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +21.9%
Contains more FolateFolate +3550%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +100%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +216.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +30.9%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +300%
Contains more CholineCholine +19650%
~equal in Vitamin C ~0mg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
26% 3% 60% 3% 8%
Protein: 25.56 g
Fats: 3.25 g
Carbs: 59.87 g
Water: 3.49 g
Other: 7.83 g
25% 20% 55%
Protein: 24.98 g
Fats: 19.64 g
Carbs: 0 g
Water: 55.22 g
Other: 0.16 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +∞%
Contains more OtherOther +4793.8%
Contains more FatsFats +504.3%
Contains more WaterWater +1482.2%
~equal in Protein ~24.98g

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
39% 19% 42%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.084 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.532 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 1.148 g
46% 50% 4%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 8.66 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 9.457 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.81 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -87.5%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +41.7%
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +1677.6%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Papadum Chuck steak
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in Sugar Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Papadum Chuck steak DV% diff.
Vitamin B12 0µg 3.03µg 126%
Copper 0.998mg 0.077mg 102%
Fiber 18.6g 0g 74%
Sodium 1745mg 71mg 73%
Manganese 1.562mg 0.012mg 67%
Iron 7.8mg 2.45mg 67%
Magnesium 271mg 22mg 59%
Folate 219µg 6µg 53%
Zinc 3.4mg 8.68mg 48%
Selenium 8.3µg 27.5µg 35%
Saturated fat 1.084g 8.66g 34%
Cholesterol 4mg 87mg 28%
Phosphorus 385mg 193mg 27%
Fats 3.25g 19.64g 25%
Monounsaturated fat 0.532g 9.457g 22%
Vitamin B3 1.472mg 4.663mg 20%
Potassium 1000mg 325mg 20%
Carbs 59.87g 0g 20%
Vitamin B1 0.277mg 0.066mg 18%
Choline 0.4mg 79mg 14%
Calcium 143mg 16mg 13%
Vitamin B6 0.285mg 0.373mg 7%
Vitamin B2 0.258mg 0.191mg 5%
Calories 371kcal 277kcal 5%
Vitamin B5 0.917mg 0.752mg 3%
Polyunsaturated fat 1.148g 0.81g 2%
Protein 25.56g 24.98g 1%
Vitamin D 0µg 0.1µg 1%
Vitamin K 0.4µg 1.6µg 1%
Vitamin A 13µg 7µg 1%
Vitamin D 0IU 5IU 1%
Net carbs 41.27g 0g N/A
Vitamin E 0.05mg 0.1mg 0%
Trans fat 1.287g N/A
Tryptophan 0.266mg 0.281mg 0%
Threonine 0.886mg 1.099mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.303mg 1.062mg 0%
Leucine 2.115mg 2.009mg 0%
Lysine 1.695mg 2.184mg 0%
Methionine 0.372mg 0.709mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.491mg 0.951mg 0%
Valine 1.434mg 1.129mg 0%
Histidine 0.715mg 0.809mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0g 0.001g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.041g N/A
Omega-3 - DPA 0g 0.004g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.006g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 0.619g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Papadum Chuck steak
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Papadum
Papadum vs Macaroon
Macaroon
Papadum
Papadum vs Cocktail sauce
Cocktail sauce
Papadum
Papadum vs Patty
Patty
Chuck steak
Chuck steak vs Rib eye steak
Rib eye steak
Chuck steak
Chuck steak vs Steak
Steak
Chuck steak
Chuck steak vs Beefsteak raw
Beefsteak raw

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
34%
Papadum
55%
Chuck steak
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
168%
Papadum
65%
Chuck steak

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 83mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Papadum
Papadum is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 7.576g)
Which food is cheaper?
Papadum
Papadum is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1674mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 46)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Papadum - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/168106/nutrients
  2. Chuck steak - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171228/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.