Succotash vs. Feijoa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are succotash and feijoa different?
- Succotash is higher in manganese, iron, vitamin B1, copper, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin B3, and potassium; however, feijoa is richer in vitamin C and fiber.
- Daily need coverage for manganese for succotash is 26% higher.
- Succotash contains 35 times more vitamin B1 than feijoa. While succotash contains 0.208mg of vitamin B1, feijoa contains only 0.006mg.
Succotash, (corn and limas), raw and Feijoa, raw are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +433.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +114.5% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1207.1% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +416.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +916.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +494.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +719% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -25% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +3366.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +355.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +438% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +94% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +73.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +117.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +82% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +608.5% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +142.9% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +28.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +231.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +13.9% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +253.6% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +259.6% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -45.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 0.688mg | 0.084mg | 26% |
| Iron | 1.83mg | 0.14mg | 21% |
| Vitamin C | 15.1mg | 32.9mg | 20% |
| Copper | 0.186mg | 0.036mg | 17% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.208mg | 0.006mg | 17% |
| Phosphorus | 113mg | 19mg | 13% |
| Fiber | 3.8g | 6.4g | 10% |
| Protein | 5.03g | 0.71g | 9% |
| Magnesium | 48mg | 9mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.587mg | 0.295mg | 8% |
| Potassium | 369mg | 172mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.082mg | 0.018mg | 5% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg | 0.067mg | 5% |
| Zinc | 0.61mg | 0.06mg | 5% |
| Folate | 40µg | 23µg | 4% |
| Fructose | 2.95g | 4% | |
| Vitamin K | 3.5µg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.128mg | 0.233mg | 2% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.489g | 0.136g | 2% |
| Calories | 99kcal | 61kcal | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 0µg | 2% |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 1% | |
| Fats | 1.02g | 0.42g | 1% |
| Carbs | 19.59g | 15.21g | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.16mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 15.79g | 8.81g | N/A |
| Calcium | 18mg | 17mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 8.2g | N/A | |
| Sodium | 4mg | 3mg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.19g | 0.104g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.198g | 0.056g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.056mg | 0.007mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.209mg | 0.019mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.284mg | 0.019mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.443mg | 0.028mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.295mg | 0.038mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.068mg | 0.007mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.243mg | 0.019mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.306mg | 0.019mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.16mg | 0.009mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.029g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.107g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
17%
14%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
7%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Succotash is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.2g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 31)
Which food is cheaper?
Succotash is cheaper (difference - $1.3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Feijoa contains less Sodium (difference - 1mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Feijoa is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.086g)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.