Tuna salad vs. Ling fish — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the main differences between tuna salad and ling fish?
- Tuna salad is richer in vitamin B3 and vitamin B12, while ling fish is higher in vitamin B6, magnesium, vitamin B2, phosphorus, selenium, and potassium.
- Tuna salad's daily need coverage for vitamin B3 is 24% higher.
- Ling fish has 2 times less sodium than tuna salad. Tuna salad has 402mg of sodium, while ling fish has 173mg.
We used Fish, tuna salad and Fish, ling, cooked, dry heat types in this comparison.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +20.5% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +326.3% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +158.8% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +173% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +78.6% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +42.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -57% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +13.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +139.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +84.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +45.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +309.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +230% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +41.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +333.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
16.04 g
Fats:
9.26 g
Carbs:
9.41 g
Water:
63.16 g
Other:
2.13 g
Protein:
24.35 g
Fats:
0.82 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
73.88 g
Other:
0.95 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +1029.3% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +124.2% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +51.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +17% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.122g | 27% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 6.7mg | 2.801mg | 24% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.2µg | 0.65µg | 23% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.081mg | 0.351mg | 21% |
| Protein | 16.04g | 24.35g | 17% |
| Magnesium | 19mg | 81mg | 15% |
| Fats | 9.26g | 0.82g | 13% |
| Cholesterol | 13mg | 51mg | 13% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.07mg | 0.231mg | 12% |
| Phosphorus | 178mg | 254mg | 11% |
| Selenium | 41.2µg | 46.8µg | 10% |
| Sodium | 402mg | 173mg | 10% |
| Potassium | 178mg | 486mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.031mg | 0.127mg | 8% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.887g | 7% | |
| Saturated fat | 1.544g | 7% | |
| Calories | 187kcal | 111kcal | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.56mg | 1mg | 4% |
| Calcium | 17mg | 44mg | 3% |
| Carbs | 9.41g | 0g | 3% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.26mg | 0.369mg | 2% |
| Iron | 1mg | 0.83mg | 2% |
| Vitamin C | 2.2mg | 0mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 24µg | 35µg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 9.41g | 0g | N/A |
| Copper | 0.145mg | 0.141mg | 0% |
| Manganese | 0.04mg | 0.038mg | 0% |
| Folate | 8µg | 8µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.18mg | 0.273mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.701mg | 1.067mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.739mg | 1.122mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.293mg | 1.979mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.457mg | 2.236mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.47mg | 0.721mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.626mg | 0.95mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.824mg | 1.254mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.467mg | 0.717mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.014g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.055g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
27%
26%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
49%
61%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tuna salad is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 38mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tuna salad is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Ling fish contains less Sodium (difference - 229mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Ling fish is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.544g)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.