Wasabi vs. Papadum — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between Wasabi and Papadum
- Wasabi is richer in Vitamin C, while Papadum is higher in Copper, Iron, Manganese, Folate, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Fiber, and Zinc.
- Papadum covers your daily Copper needs 94% more than Wasabi.
- Wasabi is lower in Sodium.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Wasabi, root, raw and Papad.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
less
Sodium
-99%
Contains
more
Calcium
+11.7%
Contains
more
Iron
+657.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+292.8%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+381.3%
Contains
more
Potassium
+76.1%
Contains
more
Zinc
+109.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+543.9%
Contains
more
Manganese
+299.5%
Contains
less
Sodium
-99%
Contains
more
Calcium
+11.7%
Contains
more
Iron
+657.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+292.8%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+381.3%
Contains
more
Potassium
+76.1%
Contains
more
Zinc
+109.9%
Contains
more
Copper
+543.9%
Contains
more
Manganese
+299.5%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+42.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+111.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+126.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+98.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+351.7%
Contains
more
Folate
+1116.7%
Equal in Vitamin B6 - 0.285
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+42.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+111.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+126.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+98.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+351.7%
Contains
more
Folate
+1116.7%
Equal in Vitamin B6 - 0.285
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Water
+1880.2%
Contains
more
Protein
+432.5%
Contains
more
Fats
+415.9%
Contains
more
Carbs
+154.3%
Contains
more
Other
+307.8%
Contains
more
Water
+1880.2%
Contains
more
Protein
+432.5%
Contains
more
Fats
+415.9%
Contains
more
Carbs
+154.3%
Contains
more
Other
+307.8%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 15.74g | 41.27g |
|
| Protein | 4.8g | 25.56g |
|
| Fats | 0.63g | 3.25g |
|
| Carbs | 23.54g | 59.87g |
|
| Calories | 109kcal | 371kcal |
|
| Fiber | 7.8g | 18.6g |
|
| Calcium | 128mg | 143mg |
|
| Iron | 1.03mg | 7.8mg |
|
| Magnesium | 69mg | 271mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 80mg | 385mg |
|
| Potassium | 568mg | 1000mg |
|
| Sodium | 17mg | 1745mg |
|
| Zinc | 1.62mg | 3.4mg |
|
| Copper | 0.155mg | 0.998mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.391mg | 1.562mg |
|
| Selenium | 8.3µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 35IU | 50IU |
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 2µg | 13µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.05mg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 41.9mg | 0mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.131mg | 0.277mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.114mg | 0.258mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.743mg | 1.472mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.203mg | 0.917mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.274mg | 0.285mg |
|
| Folate | 18µg | 219µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 0.4µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.266mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.886mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 1.303mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 2.115mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 1.695mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.372mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.491mg |
|
|
| Valine | 1.434mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.715mg |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 4mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 1.084g |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.532g |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.148g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
25%
37%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
168%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Wasabi is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Wasabi contains less Sodium (difference - 1728mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Wasabi is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 4mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Wasabi is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 1.084g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Wasabi is lower in glycemic index (difference - 5)
Which food is cheaper?
Papadum is cheaper (difference - $1.6)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Papadum is relatively richer in vitamins