White wine vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between white wine and Limburger
- The amount of phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, selenium, vitamin A, and vitamin B5 in Limburger is higher than in white wine.
- Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 84% more than white wine.
- White wine contains less sodium.
- Limburger has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of Limburger is 27, while the glycemic index of white wine is 0.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Alcoholic beverage, wine, table, white and Cheese, limburger.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +107.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.4% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +207.9% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +110% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +5422.2% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +80.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +425% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +1650% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2083.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +14400% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +1500% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +3253.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +46.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +2515.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +72% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +475% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +5700% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +258.1% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0.07 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
2.6 g
Water:
86.86 g
Other:
10.47 g
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +430.6% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +79.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +176.3% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +28542.9% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0g | 16.746g | 76% |
| Phosphorus | 18mg | 393mg | 54% |
| Calcium | 9mg | 497mg | 49% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Fats | 0g | 27.25g | 42% |
| Protein | 0.07g | 20.05g | 40% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.503mg | 38% |
| Sodium | 5mg | 800mg | 35% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 0.1µg | 14.5µg | 26% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.045mg | 1.177mg | 23% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0g | 8.606g | 22% |
| Zinc | 0.12mg | 2.1mg | 18% |
| Folate | 1µg | 58µg | 14% |
| Calories | 82kcal | 327kcal | 12% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.005mg | 0.08mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.05mg | 0.086mg | 3% |
| Manganese | 0.117mg | 0.038mg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0g | 0.495g | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 20IU | 3% |
| Magnesium | 10mg | 21mg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0mg | 0.23mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 0.4µg | 2.3µg | 2% |
| Choline | 4.3mg | 15.4mg | 2% |
| Potassium | 71mg | 128mg | 2% |
| Iron | 0.27mg | 0.13mg | 2% |
| Copper | 0.004mg | 0.021mg | 2% |
| Carbs | 2.6g | 0.49g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 2.6g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.96g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.108mg | 0.158mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
2%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
6%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
White wine is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
White wine contains less Sodium (difference - 795mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
White wine is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.746g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
White wine is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is cheaper?
White wine is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.47g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins