Crateva religiosa vs. Garden rhubarb — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between crateva religiosa and garden rhubarb
- Crateva religiosa is richer in vitamin C, iron, and fiber, yet garden rhubarb is richer in calcium.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin C for crateva religiosa is 51% higher.
- Crateva religiosa contains 8 times more sugar than garden rhubarb. Crateva religiosa contains 8.55g of sugar, while garden rhubarb contains 1.1g.
Food types used in this article are Abiyuch, raw and Rhubarb, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +100% |
| Contains more IronIron | +631.8% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +171.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +210% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +235.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +975% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -80% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +576.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.5 g
Fats:
0.1 g
Carbs:
17.6 g
Water:
79.9 g
Other:
0.9 g
Protein:
0.9 g
Fats:
0.2 g
Carbs:
4.54 g
Water:
93.61 g
Other:
0.75 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +66.7% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +287.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +20% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +100% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +17.2% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.014 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.053 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.039 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.099 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -73.6% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin C | 54.1mg | 8mg | 51% |
| Vitamin K | 29.3µg | 24% | |
| Iron | 1.61mg | 0.22mg | 17% |
| Fiber | 5.3g | 1.8g | 14% |
| Calcium | 8mg | 86mg | 8% |
| Fructose | 3.8g | 5% | |
| Phosphorus | 47mg | 14mg | 5% |
| Copper | 0.057mg | 0.021mg | 4% |
| Carbs | 17.6g | 4.54g | 4% |
| Magnesium | 24mg | 12mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.03mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.3mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.024mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.085mg | 2% | |
| Selenium | 1.1µg | 2% | |
| Folate | 7µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.02mg | 2% | |
| Calories | 69kcal | 21kcal | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.27mg | 2% | |
| Zinc | 0.31mg | 0.1mg | 2% |
| Manganese | 0.182mg | 0.196mg | 1% |
| Protein | 1.5g | 0.9g | 1% |
| Sodium | 20mg | 4mg | 1% |
| Choline | 6.1mg | 1% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.099g | 1% | |
| Fats | 0.1g | 0.2g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 12.3g | 2.74g | N/A |
| Potassium | 304mg | 288mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 8.55g | 1.1g | N/A |
| Vitamin A | 5µg | 5µg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.014g | 0.053g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.039g | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
14%
11%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
12%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Garden rhubarb is lower in Sugar (difference - 7.45g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Garden rhubarb contains less Sodium (difference - 16mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Garden rhubarb is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Crateva religiosa is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Crateva religiosa is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.039g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Crateva religiosa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 13)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Crateva religiosa is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)