Custard apple vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between custard apple and Limburger
- Custard apple has more vitamin C; however, Limburger is richer in phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, vitamin A, and vitamin B5.
- Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 83% more than custard apple.
- Custard apple contains less saturated fat.
- Custard apple has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of custard apple is 54, while the glycemic index of Limburger is 27.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Custard-apple, (bullock's-heart), raw and Cheese, limburger.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +198.4% |
| Contains more IronIron | +446.2% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.5% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +16.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1556.7% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +1771.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +216.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +157% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +16900% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +403% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +771.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.7 g
Fats:
0.6 g
Carbs:
25.2 g
Water:
71.5 g
Other:
1 g
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +5042.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +47.7% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1079.4% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +4441.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +279% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.231 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.495 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.6% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0.231g | 16.746g | 75% |
| Phosphorus | 21mg | 393mg | 53% |
| Calcium | 30mg | 497mg | 47% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Fats | 0.6g | 27.25g | 41% |
| Vitamin A | 2µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Protein | 1.7g | 20.05g | 37% |
| Sodium | 4mg | 800mg | 35% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.1mg | 0.503mg | 31% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 26% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 22% | |
| Vitamin C | 19.2mg | 0mg | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.135mg | 1.177mg | 21% |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 19% | |
| Folate | 58µg | 15% | |
| Calories | 101kcal | 327kcal | 11% |
| Fiber | 2.4g | 0g | 10% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.221mg | 0.086mg | 10% |
| Carbs | 25.2g | 0.49g | 8% |
| Iron | 0.71mg | 0.13mg | 7% |
| Potassium | 382mg | 128mg | 7% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 3% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 3% | |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 2% | |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.5mg | 0.158mg | 2% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 2% | |
| Magnesium | 18mg | 21mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 22.8g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.49g | N/A | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.08mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.007mg | 0.289mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.037mg | 1.675mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.004mg | 0.619mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
14%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
9%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Custard apple is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Custard apple is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.49g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Custard apple contains less Sodium (difference - 796mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Custard apple is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.515g)
Which food is cheaper?
Custard apple is cheaper (difference - $3)