Mackerel vs Pacific saury - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between Mackerel and Pacific saury
- Mackerel has more Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Selenium, Vitamin B6, Vitamin E , Iron and Vitamin B2 than Pacific saury.
- Mackerel's daily need coverage for Vitamin B12 is 417% more.
- Mackerel contains 114 times more Sodium than Pacific saury. Mackerel contains 4450mg of Sodium, while Pacific saury contains 39mg.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Fish, mackerel, salted and Fish, pike, northern, raw.
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Iron
+154.5%
Contains
more
Calcium
+15.8%
Contains
more
Potassium
+100.8%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+93.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+96.1%
Contains
more
Zinc
+64.2%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+15.5%
Contains
less
Sodium
-99.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+154.5%
Contains
more
Calcium
+15.8%
Contains
more
Potassium
+100.8%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+93.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+96.1%
Contains
more
Zinc
+64.2%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+15.5%
Contains
less
Sodium
-99.1%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+124.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+1090%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+908%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+201.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+43.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+250.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+500%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+7700%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+190%
Equal in Folate - 15
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+124.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+1090%
Contains
more
Vitamin D
+908%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+201.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+43.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+250.4%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+500%
Contains
more
Vitamin K
+7700%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+190%
Equal in Folate - 15
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
212
42
Mineral Summary Score
114
27
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
111%
116%
Carbohydrates
0%
0%
Fats
116%
3%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars | Equal | ||
| Lower in glycemic index | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
| Low glycemic index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Pacific saury is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 56mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Pacific saury contains less Sodium (difference - 4411mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Pacific saury is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 7.03g)
Which food is cheaper?
Pacific saury is cheaper (difference - $7)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Mackerel is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Mackerel is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugars?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugars (0 g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 305 | 88 |
|
| Protein | 18.5 | 19.26 |
|
| Fats | 25.1 | 0.69 |
|
| Vitamin C | 0 | 3.8 |
|
| Carbs | 0 | 0 | |
| Cholesterol | 95 | 39 |
|
| Vitamin D | 1006 | 99 |
|
| Iron | 1.4 | 0.55 |
|
| Calcium | 66 | 57 |
|
| Potassium | 520 | 259 |
|
| Magnesium | 60 | 31 |
|
| Sugars | 0 | 0 | |
| Fiber | 0 | 0 | |
| Copper | 0.1 | 0.051 |
|
| Zinc | 1.1 | 0.67 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 254 | 220 |
|
| Sodium | 4450 | 39 |
|
| Vitamin A | 157 | 70 |
|
| Vitamin E | 2.38 | 0.2 |
|
| Vitamin D | 25.2 | 2.5 |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.02 | 0.058 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.19 | 0.063 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 3.3 | 2.3 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.75 |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.41 | 0.117 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 12 | 2 |
|
| Vitamin K | 7.8 | 0.1 |
|
| Folate | 15 | 15 | |
| Trans Fat | |||
| Saturated Fat | 7.148 | 0.118 |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.32 | 0.157 |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 6.21 | 0.202 |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.216 |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.844 |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.887 |
|
|
| Leucine | 1.565 |
|
|
| Lysine | 1.768 |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.57 |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.752 |
|
|
| Valine | 0.992 |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.567 |
|
|
| Fructose |