Kielbasa vs. Hash browns — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between kielbasa and hash browns
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C and iron; however, hash browns are richer in fiber and polyunsaturated fat.
- Kielbasa covers your daily sodium needs 28% more than hash browns.
- Hash browns have a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of hash browns is 56, while the glycemic index of kielbasa is 28.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Fast foods, potatoes, hash browns, round pieces or patty.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +106.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -52.8% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +174.1% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
2.58 g
Fats:
17.04 g
Carbs:
28.88 g
Water:
49.27 g
Other:
2.23 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +407.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +25.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +52.5% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +640.5% |
~equal in
Fats
~17.04g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.54 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
7.827 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
5.665 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -59.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +143.1% |
~equal in
Monounsaturated fat
~7.827g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 566mg | 28% |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg | 23% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 5.665g | 22% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 2.58g | 21% |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 2.54g | 17% |
| Vitamin E | 2.62mg | 17% | |
| Phosphorus | 98mg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.186mg | 14% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 2.7g | 11% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.838mg | 11% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.137mg | 11% | |
| Copper | 0.1mg | 11% | |
| Starch | 25.74g | 11% | |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 5.4mg | 10% |
| Potassium | 355mg | 10% | |
| Vitamin K | 9.9µg | 8% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.38mg | 8% | |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 28.88g | 8% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 0.6mg | 8% |
| Manganese | 0.158mg | 7% | |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 5% | |
| Zinc | 0.36mg | 3% | |
| Folate | 12µg | 3% | |
| Choline | 17.8mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.038mg | 3% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 272kcal | 2% |
| Calcium | 19mg | 2% | |
| Selenium | 0.4µg | 1% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 7.827g | 1% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 17.04g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 26.18g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 0.56g | N/A |
| Trans fat | 0.056g | N/A | |
| Fructose | 0.24g | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.441g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.03g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.008g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 5.131g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
20%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
26%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Kielbasa is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.56g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Hash browns is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Hash browns contains less Sodium (difference - 634mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Hash browns is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.69g)
Which food is cheaper?
Hash browns is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Hash browns is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Hash browns is relatively richer in vitamins