Limburger vs. Condensed milk — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Limburger and Condensed milk different?
- Limburger is higher in Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Calcium, Phosphorus, Folate, and Zinc, however, Condensed milk is richer in Choline.
- Daily need coverage for Saturated Fat from Limburger is 56% higher.
- Limburger contains 6 times more Sodium than Condensed milk. While Limburger contains 800mg of Sodium, Condensed milk contains only 127mg.
Cheese, limburger and Milk, canned, condensed, sweetened are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +75% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +40% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +123.4% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +55.3% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +533.3% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +23.8% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +189.8% |
| Contains more IronIron | +46.2% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -84.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +332.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +43.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +150% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +20.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +56.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +68.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +136.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +283.3% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +427.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +12.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +32.9% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +478.6% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
Protein:
7.91 g
Fats:
8.7 g
Carbs:
54.4 g
Water:
27.16 g
Other:
1.83 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +153.5% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +213.2% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +78.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +107.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +11002% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
16.746 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.495 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
5.486 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
2.427 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.337 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +254.6% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +46.9% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -67.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 327kcal | 321kcal |
|
| Protein | 20.05g | 7.91g |
|
| Fats | 27.25g | 8.7g |
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 2.6mg |
|
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 54.4g |
|
| Carbs | 0.49g | 54.4g |
|
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 34mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 6IU |
|
| Magnesium | 21mg | 26mg |
|
| Calcium | 497mg | 284mg |
|
| Potassium | 128mg | 371mg |
|
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.19mg |
|
| Sugar | 0.49g | 54.4g |
|
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.015mg |
|
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0.94mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 253mg |
|
| Sodium | 800mg | 127mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 1155IU | 267IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 74µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 0.16mg |
|
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 0.2µg |
|
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.006mg |
|
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 14.8µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.09mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0.416mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 0.21mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0.75mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0.051mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 0.44µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 0.6µg |
|
| Folate | 58µg | 11µg |
|
| Choline | 15.4mg | 89.1mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 16.746g | 5.486g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.606g | 2.427g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 0.337g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0.112mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0.357mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0.479mg |
|
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0.775mg |
|
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0.627mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0.198mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0.382mg |
|
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0.529mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0.214mg |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
39%
25%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
38%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 53.91g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 34)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Condensed milk is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 56mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Condensed milk contains less Sodium (difference - 673mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Condensed milk is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 11.26g)
Which food is cheaper?
Condensed milk is cheaper (difference - $1.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.