Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Nattō — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

What are the differences between Limburger and Nattō?

  • Limburger is higher in Vitamin B12, Vitamin A RAE, Phosphorus, and Calcium, yet Nattō is higher in Iron, Copper, and Manganese.
  • Nattō's daily need coverage for Iron is 106% more.
  • The amount of Cholesterol in Nattō is lower.

We used Cheese, limburger and Natto types in this article.

Infographic

Limburger vs Nattō infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Calcium +129%
Contains more Phosphorus +125.9%
Contains more Selenium +64.8%
Contains more Iron +6515.4%
Contains more Magnesium +447.6%
Contains more Potassium +469.5%
Contains less Sodium -99.1%
Contains more Zinc +44.3%
Contains more Copper +3076.2%
Contains more Manganese +3921.1%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 150% 5% 15% 169% 12% 105% 58% 7% 5% 80%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 66% 323% 83% 75% 65% 1% 83% 223% 200% 48%
Contains more Calcium +129%
Contains more Phosphorus +125.9%
Contains more Selenium +64.8%
Contains more Iron +6515.4%
Contains more Magnesium +447.6%
Contains more Potassium +469.5%
Contains less Sodium -99.1%
Contains more Zinc +44.3%
Contains more Copper +3076.2%
Contains more Manganese +3921.1%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
4
Nattō
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +2200%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +164.7%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +447.4%
Contains more Folate +625%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +100%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +51.2%
Contains more Vitamin K +904.3%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 70% 5% 15% 0% 20% 117% 3% 71% 20% 44% 130% 6%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 0% 1% 0% 44% 40% 44% 0% 13% 30% 6% 0% 58%
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +2200%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +164.7%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +447.4%
Contains more Folate +625%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +100%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +51.2%
Contains more Vitamin K +904.3%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more Fats +147.7%
Contains more Other +99.5%
Contains more Carbs +2487.8%
Contains more Water +13.6%
Equal in Protein - 19.4
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
19% 11% 13% 55% 2%
Protein: 19.4 g
Fats: 11 g
Carbs: 12.68 g
Water: 55.02 g
Other: 1.9 g
Contains more Fats +147.7%
Contains more Other +99.5%
Contains more Carbs +2487.8%
Contains more Water +13.6%
Equal in Protein - 19.4

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +254.2%
Contains less Saturated Fat -90.5%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +1154.5%
65% 33% 2%
Saturated Fat: 16.746 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 0.495 g
16% 24% 61%
Saturated Fat: 1.591 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 2.43 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 6.21 g
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +254.2%
Contains less Saturated Fat -90.5%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +1154.5%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Nattō
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in price ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Rich in minerals Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Nattō Opinion
Net carbs 0.49g 7.28g Nattō
Protein 20.05g 19.4g Limburger
Fats 27.25g 11g Limburger
Carbs 0.49g 12.68g Nattō
Calories 327kcal 211kcal Limburger
Sugar 0.49g 4.89g Limburger
Fiber 0g 5.4g Nattō
Calcium 497mg 217mg Limburger
Iron 0.13mg 8.6mg Nattō
Magnesium 21mg 115mg Nattō
Phosphorus 393mg 174mg Limburger
Potassium 128mg 729mg Nattō
Sodium 800mg 7mg Nattō
Zinc 2.1mg 3.03mg Nattō
Copper 0.021mg 0.667mg Nattō
Manganese 0.038mg 1.528mg Nattō
Selenium 14.5µg 8.8µg Limburger
Vitamin A 1155IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin A RAE 340µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.01mg Limburger
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin C 0mg 13mg Nattō
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.16mg Nattō
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.19mg Limburger
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 0mg Limburger
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.215mg Limburger
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.13mg Nattō
Folate 58µg 8µg Limburger
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin K 2.3µg 23.1µg Nattō
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.223mg Limburger
Threonine 0.739mg 0.813mg Nattō
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.931mg Limburger
Leucine 2.093mg 1.509mg Limburger
Lysine 1.675mg 1.145mg Limburger
Methionine 0.619mg 0.208mg Limburger
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.941mg Limburger
Valine 1.439mg 1.018mg Limburger
Histidine 0.578mg 0.512mg Limburger
Cholesterol 90mg 0mg Nattō
Saturated Fat 16.746g 1.591g Nattō
Monounsaturated Fat 8.606g 2.43g Limburger
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 6.21g Nattō

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Nattō
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Calories diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
41%
Limburger
20%
Nattō
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
116%
Nattō

Comparison summary

Which food contains less Sodium?
Nattō
Nattō contains less Sodium (difference - 793mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Nattō
Nattō is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Nattō
Nattō is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 15.155g)
Which food is cheaper?
Nattō
Nattō is cheaper (difference - $0.9)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.4g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 29)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Nattō - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/172443/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.