Limburger vs. Papadum — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Limburger and papadum
- Limburger has more vitamin B12 and calcium; however, papadum has more copper, iron, fiber, manganese, magnesium, and folate.
- Daily need coverage for copper for papadum is 109% higher.
- Papadum is lower in saturated fat.
- Papadum has a higher glycemic index than Limburger.
Food types used in this article are Cheese, limburger and Papad.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +247.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -54.2% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +74.7% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +1190.5% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +681.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +5900% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +4652.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +61.9% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +4010.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +2515.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +360% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +95% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +28.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +475% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +3750% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +246.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +831.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +231.4% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +277.6% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more FatsFats | +738.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +1287.4% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +27.5% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +12118.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +106.6% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +1517.7% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -93.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +131.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.998mg | 109% |
| Iron | 0.13mg | 7.8mg | 96% |
| Fiber | 0g | 18.6g | 74% |
| Saturated fat | 16.746g | 1.084g | 71% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 1.562mg | 66% |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 271mg | 60% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 0µg | 43% |
| Sodium | 800mg | 1745mg | 41% |
| Folate | 58µg | 219µg | 40% |
| Fats | 27.25g | 3.25g | 37% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 13µg | 36% |
| Calcium | 497mg | 143mg | 35% |
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 4mg | 29% |
| Potassium | 128mg | 1000mg | 26% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 0.532g | 20% |
| Carbs | 0.49g | 59.87g | 20% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0.258mg | 19% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.277mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0.285mg | 15% |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 3.4mg | 12% |
| Protein | 20.05g | 25.56g | 11% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 8.3µg | 11% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 1.472mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0.917mg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 1.148g | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 0µg | 3% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 0.4mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 0IU | 3% |
| Calories | 327kcal | 371kcal | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 0.4µg | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 0.05mg | 1% |
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 385mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 41.27g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.49g | 0g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0.266mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0.886mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 1.303mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 2.115mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 1.695mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0.372mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 1.491mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 1.434mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0.715mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
34%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
168%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Papadum is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 86mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Papadum is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.49g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Papadum is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 15.662g)
Which food is cheaper?
Papadum is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Limburger contains less Sodium (difference - 945mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 19)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins