Ling fish vs. Croaker — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are ling fish and croaker different?
- Ling fish is higher in selenium, magnesium, copper, vitamin B2, and vitamin B6; however, croaker is richer in vitamin B12, vitamin B3, and vitamin B5.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin B12 for croaker is 60% higher.
- Ling fish contains 2 times more copper than croaker. While ling fish contains 0.141mg of copper, croaker contains only 0.065mg.
- Ling fish has less cholesterol.
Fish, ling, cooked, dry heat and Fish, croaker, Atlantic, cooked, breaded and fried are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +92.9% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +37.5% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +42.9% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +116.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +92.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +17.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -50.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +20.6% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +110.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +52.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +41.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +77.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +35% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +53.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +100.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +223.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +325% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +33.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +23.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1445.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +92.6% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.65µg | 2.1µg | 60% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.917g | 19% | |
| Fats | 0.82g | 12.67g | 18% |
| Saturated fat | 3.476g | 16% | |
| Selenium | 46.8µg | 38.8µg | 15% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 5.32g | 13% | |
| Protein | 24.35g | 18.2g | 12% |
| Cholesterol | 51mg | 84mg | 11% |
| Vitamin B3 | 2.801mg | 4.3mg | 9% |
| Magnesium | 81mg | 42mg | 9% |
| Copper | 0.141mg | 0.065mg | 8% |
| Sodium | 173mg | 348mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.231mg | 0.13mg | 8% |
| Folate | 8µg | 34µg | 7% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.351mg | 0.26mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.369mg | 0.74mg | 7% |
| Calories | 111kcal | 221kcal | 6% |
| Phosphorus | 254mg | 217mg | 5% |
| Zinc | 1mg | 0.52mg | 4% |
| Potassium | 486mg | 340mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.127mg | 0.09mg | 3% |
| Carbs | 0g | 7.54g | 3% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.08mg | 2% |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.4g | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 35µg | 23µg | 1% |
| Calcium | 44mg | 32mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 7.14g | N/A |
| Iron | 0.83mg | 0.86mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.273mg | 0.208mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 1.067mg | 0.788mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.122mg | 0.847mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.979mg | 1.48mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.236mg | 1.571mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.721mg | 0.525mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.95mg | 0.742mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.254mg | 0.947mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.717mg | 0.525mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.113g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.089g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.079g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
26%
41%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
61%
50%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Ling fish is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 33mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Ling fish contains less Sodium (difference - 175mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Ling fish is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.476g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Ling fish is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.