Lingcod vs. Sucker fish — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the main differences between lingcod and sucker fish?
- Lingcod is richer in vitamin B12, selenium, vitamin B6, and vitamin B3, while sucker fish is higher in manganese, copper, iron, and calcium.
- Lingcod's daily need coverage for vitamin B12 is 77% higher.
- Sucker fish has 3 times less selenium than lingcod. Lingcod has 46.8µg of selenium, while sucker fish has 16.2µg.
We used Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat and Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat types in this comparison.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +15% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +188.9% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +15.2% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +400% |
| Contains more IronIron | +307.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +614.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +65.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -32.9% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +2857.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +191.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +63.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +58.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +49.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +79.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +247.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +70% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
22.64 g
Fats:
1.36 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
75.68 g
Other:
0.32 g
Protein:
21.49 g
Fats:
2.97 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
73.99 g
Other:
1.55 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +118.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +384.4% |
~equal in
Protein
~21.49g
~equal in
Carbs
~0g
~equal in
Water
~73.99g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.255 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.447 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.383 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.579 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.905 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.035 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -56% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +102.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +170.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 4.15µg | 2.31µg | 77% |
| Selenium | 46.8µg | 16.2µg | 56% |
| Manganese | 0.026mg | 0.769mg | 32% |
| Copper | 0.035mg | 0.25mg | 24% |
| Iron | 0.41mg | 1.67mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.346mg | 0.231mg | 9% |
| Calcium | 18mg | 90mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B3 | 2.314mg | 1.462mg | 5% |
| Vitamin A | 17µg | 59µg | 5% |
| Cholesterol | 67mg | 53mg | 5% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.383g | 1.035g | 4% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.139mg | 0.085mg | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.58mg | 0.96mg | 3% |
| Potassium | 560mg | 487mg | 2% |
| Folate | 10µg | 17µg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.035mg | 0.012mg | 2% |
| Fats | 1.36g | 2.97g | 2% |
| Protein | 22.64g | 21.49g | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 258mg | 269mg | 2% |
| Saturated fat | 0.255g | 0.579g | 1% |
| Calories | 109kcal | 119kcal | 1% |
| Sodium | 76mg | 51mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 33mg | 38mg | 1% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.447g | 0.905g | 1% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.865mg | 0.865mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.254mg | 0.241mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.993mg | 0.942mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.043mg | 0.99mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.84mg | 1.746mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.079mg | 1.973mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.67mg | 0.636mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.884mg | 0.839mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.166mg | 1.107mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.667mg | 0.633mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.133g | 0.244g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.13g | 0.371g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.018g | 0.094g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
58%
37%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
50%
58%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sucker fish is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 14mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Sucker fish contains less Sodium (difference - 25mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Sucker fish is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Lingcod is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.324g)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.