Papadum vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between papadum and kielbasa
- Papadum has more iron and fiber; however, kielbasa has more vitamin C, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat.
- Daily need coverage for iron for papadum is 82% higher.
- Kielbasa is lower in sodium.
- Papadum has a higher glycemic index than kielbasa.
Food types used in this article are Papad and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +529% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -31.2% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +95.1% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1435.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +130.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +441.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +1676.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -82.6% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +1454.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +103% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Copper | 0.998mg | 111% | |
| Iron | 7.8mg | 1.24mg | 82% |
| Fiber | 18.6g | 0g | 74% |
| Manganese | 1.562mg | 68% | |
| Magnesium | 271mg | 65% | |
| Folate | 219µg | 55% | |
| Phosphorus | 385mg | 55% | |
| Zinc | 3.4mg | 31% | |
| Potassium | 1000mg | 29% | |
| Protein | 25.56g | 13.1g | 25% |
| Sodium | 1745mg | 1200mg | 24% |
| Saturated fat | 1.084g | 6.23g | 23% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.277mg | 23% | |
| Cholesterol | 4mg | 70mg | 22% |
| Fats | 3.25g | 17.6g | 22% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.285mg | 22% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.258mg | 20% | |
| Carbs | 59.87g | 3.9g | 19% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.532g | 8.27g | 19% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.917mg | 18% | |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 14.8mg | 16% |
| Selenium | 8.3µg | 15% | |
| Calcium | 143mg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.472mg | 9% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.148g | 2.33g | 8% |
| Calories | 371kcal | 226kcal | 7% |
| Vitamin A | 13µg | 0µg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 41.27g | 3.9g | N/A |
| Vitamin E | 0.05mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin K | 0.4µg | 0% | |
| Choline | 0.4mg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.266mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.886mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.303mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.115mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.695mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.372mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.491mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.434mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.715mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
34%
4%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
168%
20%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Papadum is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 66mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Papadum is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 5.146g)
Which food is cheaper?
Papadum is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Papadum is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Papadum is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sodium?
Kielbasa contains less Sodium (difference - 545mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 18)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)