Pico de gallo vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between pico de gallo and kielbasa

Pico de gallo has more vitamin A, while kielbasa has more iron and vitamin C.
Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 32% higher.
The amount of sugar in kielbasa is lower.

The food types used in this comparison are PACE, Pico De Gallo and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked.

Infographic

Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Pico de gallo

Kielbasa

Contains less SodiumSodium

-60.9%

Contains more IronIron

+∞%

~equal in Magnesium ~mg

~equal in Calcium ~mg

~equal in Potassium ~mg

~equal in Copper ~mg

~equal in Zinc ~mg

~equal in Phosphorus ~mg

~equal in Manganese ~mg

~equal in Selenium ~µg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.

Pico de gallo

Kielbasa

Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C

+289.5%

~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin E ~mg

~equal in Vitamin D ~µg

~equal in Vitamin B1 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B2 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B3 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B5 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B6 ~mg

~equal in Vitamin B12 ~µg

~equal in Vitamin K ~µg

~equal in Folate ~µg

~equal in Choline ~mg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient			DV% diff.
Sodium	469mg	1200mg	32%
Saturated fat	0g	6.23g	28%
Fats	0g	17.6g	27%
Protein	0g	13.1g	26%
Cholesterol	0mg	70mg	23%
Monounsaturated fat		8.27g	21%
Iron	0mg	1.24mg	16%
Polyunsaturated fat		2.33g	16%
Vitamin C	3.8mg	14.8mg	12%
Calories	31kcal	226kcal	10%
Carbs	9.38g	3.9g	2%
Net carbs	9.38g	3.9g	N/A
Sugar	6.25g	0g	N/A