Tuna salad vs Shark - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between Tuna salad and Shark
- Tuna salad has more Vitamin B3, Copper, and Selenium, however Shark is higher in Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, Vitamin B5, Magnesium, and Vitamin A RAE.
- Shark covers your daily need of Vitamin B6 25% more than Tuna salad.
- Tuna salad has 5 times more Sodium than Shark. While Tuna salad has 402mg of Sodium, Shark has only 79mg.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Fish, tuna salad and Fish, shark, mixed species, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Contains
more
Iron
+19%
Contains
more
Potassium
+11.3%
Contains
more
Zinc
+30.2%
Contains
more
Copper
+339.4%
Contains
more
Calcium
+100%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+157.9%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+18%
Contains
less
Sodium
-80.3%
Contains
more
Iron
+19%
Contains
more
Potassium
+11.3%
Contains
more
Zinc
+30.2%
Contains
more
Copper
+339.4%
Contains
more
Calcium
+100%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+157.9%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+18%
Contains
less
Sodium
-80.3%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+12.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+128%
Contains
more
Folate
+166.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+140.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+35.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+167.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+393.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+24.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+12.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+128%
Contains
more
Folate
+166.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+140.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+35.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+167.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+393.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+24.2%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 9.41g | 0g |
|
| Protein | 16.04g | 20.98g |
|
| Fats | 9.26g | 4.51g |
|
| Carbs | 9.41g | 0g |
|
| Calories | 187kcal | 130kcal |
|
| Starch | g | g | |
| Fructose | g | g | |
| Sugar | g | 0g |
|
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | |
| Calcium | 17mg | 34mg |
|
| Iron | 1mg | 0.84mg |
|
| Magnesium | 19mg | 49mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 178mg | 210mg |
|
| Potassium | 178mg | 160mg |
|
| Sodium | 402mg | 79mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.56mg | 0.43mg |
|
| Copper | 0.145mg | 0.033mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 97IU | 233IU |
|
| Vitamin E | mg | 1mg |
|
| Vitamin D | IU | 24IU |
|
| Vitamin D | µg | 0.6µg |
|
| Vitamin C | 2.2mg | 0mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.031mg | 0.042mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.07mg | 0.062mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 6.7mg | 2.938mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.26mg | 0.695mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.081mg | 0.4mg |
|
| Folate | 8µg | 3µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 1.2µg | 1.49µg |
|
| Vitamin K | µg | 0.1µg |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.18mg | 0.235mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.701mg | 0.92mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.739mg | 0.967mg |
|
| Leucine | 1.293mg | 1.705mg |
|
| Lysine | 1.457mg | 1.926mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.47mg | 0.621mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.626mg | 0.819mg |
|
| Valine | 0.824mg | 1.081mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.467mg | 0.618mg |
|
| Cholesterol | 13mg | 51mg |
|
| Trans Fat | g | g | |
| Saturated Fat | 1.544g | 0.925g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 2.887g | 1.808g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.122g | 1.195g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
The summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfills human daily needs, the more the summary score is.
Vitamin Summary Score
29
38
Mineral Summary Score
33
27
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats, and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of food.
Protein
96%
126%
Carbohydrates
9%
0%
Fats
43%
21%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tuna salad is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tuna salad is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 38mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tuna salad is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Shark contains less Sodium (difference - 323mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Shark is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.619g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Shark is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.