Cutlet vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between cutlet and Limburger
- Cutlet has more vitamin B3, vitamin E, vitamin B2, and vitamin B6; however, Limburger is richer in phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, and vitamin A.
- Cutlet covers your daily vitamin B3 needs 163% more than Limburger.
- Limburger has 79 times less vitamin E than cutlet. Cutlet has 18.09mg of vitamin E, while Limburger has 0.23mg.
- Cutlet contains less saturated fat.
- Limburger has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of Limburger is 27, while the glycemic index of cutlet is 0.
Specific food types used in this comparison are WORTHINGTON Multigrain Cutlets, canned, unprepared and Cheese, limburger.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +1207.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -53.6% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +600% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +2159.1% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +21.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +110% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +601.8% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +7765.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +164.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +16539.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +481.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +60% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +2800% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +16.2% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1389.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +37.7% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1716.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +210.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +61.6% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +4203% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B3 | 26.29mg | 0.158mg | 163% |
| Vitamin E | 18.09mg | 0.23mg | 119% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3g | 16.746g | 75% |
| Vitamin B2 | 1.33mg | 0.503mg | 64% |
| Phosphorus | 56mg | 393mg | 48% |
| Calcium | 22mg | 497mg | 48% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Fats | 1.5g | 27.25g | 40% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 38% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.5mg | 0.086mg | 32% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 26% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 24% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.2g | 8.606g | 21% |
| Iron | 1.7mg | 0.13mg | 20% |
| Sodium | 371mg | 800mg | 19% |
| Fiber | 4.5g | 0g | 18% |
| Folate | 2µg | 58µg | 14% |
| Calories | 117kcal | 327kcal | 11% |
| Zinc | 1mg | 2.1mg | 10% |
| Protein | 23.29g | 20.05g | 6% |
| Magnesium | 3mg | 21mg | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 20IU | 3% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05mg | 0.08mg | 3% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.8g | 0.495g | 2% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 2% | |
| Carbs | 7.3g | 0.49g | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 2% | |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 2% | |
| Potassium | 105mg | 128mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 2.8g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.2g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
99%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cutlet is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Cutlet is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.29g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cutlet contains less Sodium (difference - 429mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cutlet is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.446g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Cutlet is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food is cheaper?
Cutlet is cheaper (difference - $3)